Bi-objective project portfolio selection in Lean Six Sigma

被引:43
|
作者
Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav [1 ]
Benita, Francisco [2 ]
Lopez-Ramos, Francisco [1 ]
Hernandez-Luna, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Tecnol Monterrey, Sch Sci & Engn, Campus Monterrey,Eugenio Garza Sada Ave 2501 Sur, Monterrey 64848, Mexico
[2] Singapore Univ Technol & Design, SUTD MIT Int Design Ctr, 8 Somapah Rd, Singapore 487372, Singapore
关键词
Lean Six Sigma; Project portfolio selection; Bi-objective optimization; Mixed-Integer Quadratically-Constrained Programming; Pareto-optimal solutions; VECTOR OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.015
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
There are many aspects of a successful implementation of Lean Six Sigma techniques. Typically, decision makers have to consider multiple conflicting objectives, and in many cases, they lack a formal approach for selecting projects. To meet the organization's requirements, some studies have proposed the use of multi objective combinatorial optimization techniques. However, such formulations are notoriously difficult and complex to solve in reasonable computational time. In contrast to previous works, the present study proposes a novel integrated methodology to formulate and solve the Lean Six Sigma project portfolio as a 0-1 Bi-objective Quadratic Programming Problem. The model considers interdependent project effects (quadratic objectives) and is subject to resource limitations and constraints regarding mutually exclusive projects and mandatory projects. The approach permits tackling the problem as a Mixed-Integer Quadratically-Constrained Programming Problem and thus to use the branch-and-bound algorithms implemented by the standard optimization solvers such as CPLEX or Gurobi. Numerical examples are provided to verify the efficiency and added value of the methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-objective model for project portfolio selection to implement lean and Six Sigma concepts
    Hu, G.
    Wang, L.
    Fetch, S.
    Bidanda, B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (23) : 6611 - 6625
  • [2] Bi-objective project portfolio selection and staff assignment under uncertainty
    Gutjahr, Walter J.
    Reiter, Peter
    [J]. OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 59 (03) : 417 - 445
  • [3] Hybrid bi-objective portfolio optimization with pre-selection strategy
    Qi, Rongbin
    Yen, Gary G.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 417 : 401 - 419
  • [4] A Roadmap to Evaluate Lean Six Sigma E-Health Reference Architectures Using a Fuzzy Group Bi-Objective LINMAP
    Zandi, Faramak
    Borchers, Andrew S.
    [J]. AMCIS 2012 PROCEEDINGS, 2012,
  • [5] Lean Six Sigma project selection using Best Worst Method
    Singh, Kritika
    Swarnakar, Vikas
    Singh, A. R.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 47 : 5766 - 5770
  • [6] Portfolio Selection in Indonesia Stock Market with Fuzzy Bi-Objective Linear Programming
    Subekti, Retno
    Kusumawati, Rosita
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN MATHEMATICS (ICREM7), 2015, : 97 - 102
  • [7] Portfolio analysis of a Lean Six Sigma production process
    Eva Jordan
    Janez Kušar
    Lidija Rihar
    Tomaž Berlec
    [J]. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2019, 27 : 797 - 813
  • [8] Portfolio analysis of a Lean Six Sigma production process
    Jordan, Eva
    Kusar, Janez
    Rihar, Lidija
    Berlec, Tomaz
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 27 (03) : 797 - 813
  • [9] An uncertain bi-objective mean-entropy model for portfolio selection with realistic factors
    Lv, Linjing
    Zhang, Bo
    Li, Hui
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2024, 225 : 216 - 231
  • [10] Fuzzy Bi-Objective Linear Programming for Portfolio Selection Problem with Magnitude Ranking Function
    Kusumawati, Rosita
    Subekti, Retno
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (ICMS4): MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES: CHAMPIONING THE WAY IN A PROBLEM BASED AND DATA DRIVEN SOCIETY, 2017, 1830