Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a safe procedure

被引:1
|
作者
Thomsen, Frederik Birkebaek [1 ]
Berg, Kasper Drimer [1 ]
Hvarness, Helle [2 ]
Nielsen, Jon [2 ]
Iversen, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen Prostate Canc Ctr, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Med,Fac Hlth & Med Sci, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Urol, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Med,Fac Hlth & Med Sci, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2013年 / 60卷 / 09期
关键词
COMPLICATIONS; CLASSIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: We present our departmental experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and describe complications and early results for the first 239 consecutive patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 239 patients were planned to undergo robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed with a DaVinci robot. Final histopathology and pre- and perioperative parameters were registered. Furthermore, early and late complications were recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was completed in 232 patients (97.1%). The median duration of surgery decreased significantly from initially 4.6 h in the first quartile to 3.1 h in the last quartile (p < 0.001). Overall, the median perioperative blood loss was 300 ml (range: 25-1,000 ml). The median admission time was one day (range: 1-5 days), and the median duration of bladder catheterization was eight days (range: 6-149 days). In total, 88 post-operative complications were observed in 73 patients (31.5%). A total of 70 complications appeared within 30 days of surgery, whereas 18 occurred later. Among the early complications, the majority (57.1%) were minor (Clavien-Dindo grade <= II); however, overall 2.6% suffered an early grade >= IIIb complication. Overall, the margin-positive rate was 29.3% decreasing from 43.1% in the first quartile to 24.7% in the last three quartiles (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a safe procedure with minimal blood loss, short hospitalization and short time catheter time post-operatively.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is "extreme" bladder neck preservation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy a safe procedure?
    Dal Moro, Fabrizio
    Zazzara, Michele
    Morlacco, Alessandro
    Gardiman, Marina Paola
    Costa, Giovanni
    Zattoni, Fabio
    [J]. UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2020, 87 (03) : 149 - 154
  • [2] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a safe procedure - results from a danish cohort of patients
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Thomsen, Frederik Birkebaek
    Hvarness, Helle
    Nielsen, Jon
    Iversen, Peter
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 47 : 48 - 49
  • [3] Robot-Assisted radical Prostatectomy
    Wagner, Christian
    Addali, Mustapha
    Witt, Joern H.
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2020, 51 (05) : 483 - 497
  • [4] ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Hosseini, Abolfazl
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 : A37 - A37
  • [5] The Case for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Martinez-Salamanca, Juan I.
    Rao, Sandhya
    Ramanathan, Rajan
    Leung, Robert
    Mandhani, Anil
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (09) : 2039 - 2043
  • [6] Anatomic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Joseph, J. V.
    Capello, S. A.
    Patel, H. P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 339 - 339
  • [7] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and a parachute
    Sood, Akshay
    Abdollah, Firas
    Menon, Mani
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (06) : 820 - +
  • [8] EVOLUTION OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Orvieto, M. A.
    Patel, V. R.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 98 (02) : 76 - 88
  • [9] Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Pereira, Claudio
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Patel, Vipul
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (04) : 686 - 687
  • [10] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Rotering, J.
    Siemer, S.
    Stoeckle, M.
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (04): : 420 - +