A brief psychological intervention to reduce repetition of self-harm in patients admitted to hospital following a suicide attempt: a randomised controlled trial

被引:47
|
作者
O'Connor, Rory C. [1 ]
Ferguson, Eamonn [2 ]
Scott, Fiona [1 ]
Smyth, Roger [3 ]
McDaid, David [4 ]
Park, A-La [4 ]
Beautrais, Annette [5 ]
Armitage, Christopher J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Suicidal Behav Res Lab, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Glasgow G12 0XH, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham, England
[3] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Psychol Med, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] London Sch Econ, Personal Social Serv Res Unit, Dept Social Policy, London, England
[5] Univ Canterbury, Sch Hlth Sci, Christchurch, New Zealand
[6] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Psychol, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
LANCET PSYCHIATRY | 2017年 / 4卷 / 06期
关键词
MOTIVATIONAL-VOLITIONAL MODEL; COMMUNITY SAMPLE; ADOLESCENTS; POSTCARDS; BEHAVIOR; SMOKING; REASONS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30129-3
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background We investigated whether a volitional helpsheet (VHS), a brief psychological intervention, could reduce repeat self-harm in the 6 months following a suicide attempt. Methods We did a prospective, single-site, randomised controlled trial. Patients admitted to a hospital in Edinburgh, UK, after a suicide attempt were deemed eligible for the study if they were over the age of 16 years, had a self-reported history of self-harm, were fluent in English, were medically fit to interview, and were not participating in other research studies within the hospital. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1: 1), via web-based randomisation, to receive either VHS plus usual treatment (intervention group) or only treatment as usual (control group). Randomisation was stratified by sex and self-reported past self-harm history. The Information Services Division of the National Health Service (NHS-ISD) staff and those extracting data from medical notes were masked to the study group the participant was allocated to. Clinical staff working within the hospital were also masked to participants' randomisation status. There were three primary outcomes: the proportion of paticipants who represented to hospital with self-harm during the 6-month follow-up period; the number of times a participant re-presented to hospital with self-harm during the 6-month follow-up period; and cost-effectiveness of the VHS as measured by estimated incremental cost per self-harm event averted. Primary outcomes were analysed in all randomised patients. Follow-up data collection was extracted from the Information Services Division of the NHS and from patient medical records. The trial is registered with International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, number ISRCTN99488269. Findings Between May 9, 2012, and Feb 24, 2014, we assessed 1308 people for eligibility. Of these, 259 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 259 to the control group. We obtained complete follow-up data on 512 (99%) of 518 patients (five participants were lost to follow-up in the intervention group and one in the control group). 11 patients assigned to the intervention group did not complete the VHS in hospital. Overall, the intervention did not affect the number of people who re-presented with self-harm (67 [26%] of 254 patients in the intervention group vs 71 [28%] of 258 patients in the control group, odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.58-1.39, p=0.63). The intervention had no effect on the number of re-presentations per patient (mean 0.67 [SD 2.55] re-presentations for the intervention group vs 0.85 [2.79] for the control group, incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.65, 95% CI 0.74-3.67, p=0.21). Mean total costs per person for NHS hospital services in the VHS intervention group over the 6 months were 513 pound versus 561 pound in the control group but this difference was not significant (95% CI-353 pound to 257 pound, p=0.76). Three patients died by suicide in the 6 months following their index suicide attempt (one in the intervention group and two in the control group). There were no reported unintended effects or adverse events in either group. Interpretation For the primary outcomes, there were no significant differences between groups. Although the VHS had no overall effect, post-hoc analyses suggest VHS might be effective in reducing the number of self-harm repetitions following a suicide attempt in people who complete the helpsheet and who have been previously admitted to hospital with self-harm. This is the first study to investigate the usefulness of the VHS to reduce self-harm among those who have attempted suicide. These subgroup findings require replication. The potential use of the VHS in those who self-harm for different motives requires further exploration. Copyright (C) The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 460
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] An exploratory randomised trial of a simple, brief psychological intervention to reduce subsequent suicidal ideation and behaviour in patients admitted to hospital for self-harm
    Armitage, Christopher J.
    Rahim, Wirda Abdul
    Rowe, Richard
    O'Connor, Rory C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 208 (05) : 470 - 476
  • [3] Brief psychological intervention after self-harm: randomised controlled trial from Pakistan
    Husain, Nusrat
    Afsar, Salahuddin
    Ara, Jamal
    Fayyaz, Hina
    Rahman, Reza Ur
    Tomenson, Barbara
    Hamirani, Munir
    Chaudhry, Nasim
    Fatima, Batool
    Husain, Meher
    Naeem, Farooq
    Chaudhry, Imran B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 204 (06) : 462 - 470
  • [4] Postcard intervention for repeat self-harm: randomised controlled trial
    Beautrais, Annette L.
    Gibb, Sheree J.
    Faulkner, Alan
    Fergusson, David M.
    Mulder, Roger T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 197 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [5] SELF-HARM PATIENTS NOT ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL
    OWENS, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF LONDON, 1990, 24 (04): : 281 - 283
  • [6] Efficacy of a short message service brief contact intervention (SMS-SOS) in reducing repetition of hospital-treated self-harm: randomised controlled trial
    Stevens, Garry John
    Sperandei, Sandro
    Carter, Gregory Leigh
    Munasinghe, Sithum
    Hammond, Trent Ernest
    Gunja, Naren
    de la Riva, Anabel
    Brakoulias, Vlasios
    Page, Andrew
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 224 (03) : 106 - 113
  • [7] Cognitive behavioral therapy for suicide prevention in youth admitted to hospital following an episode of self-harm: A pilot randomized controlled trial
    Sinyor, Mark
    Williams, Marissa
    Mitchell, Rachel
    Zaheer, Rabia
    Bryan, Craig J.
    Schaffer, Ayal
    Westreich, Neal
    Ellis, Janet
    Goldstein, Benjamin, I
    Cheung, Amy H.
    Selchen, Steven
    Kiss, Alex
    Tien, Homer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2020, 266 : 686 - 694
  • [8] Cognitive-behavioural intervention for self-harm: randomised controlled trial
    Slee, Nadja
    Garnefski, Nadia
    van der Leeden, Rien
    Arensman, Ella
    Spinhoven, Philip
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 192 (03) : 202 - 211
  • [9] The effect of referral for brief intervention for alcohol misuse on repetition of deliberate self-harm: an exploratory randomized controlled trial
    Crawford, M. J.
    Csipke, E.
    Brown, A.
    Reid, S.
    Nilsen, K.
    Redhead, J.
    Touquet, R.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (11) : 1821 - 1828
  • [10] Repetition of self-harm and suicide following self-harm in children and adolescents: findings from the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England
    Hawton, Keith
    Bergen, Helen
    Kapur, Navneet
    Cooper, Jayne
    Steeg, Sarah
    Ness, Jennifer
    Waters, Keith
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 53 (12) : 1212 - 1219