Focus Group Evidence: Implications for Design and Analysis

被引:99
|
作者
Ryan, Katherine E. [1 ]
Gandha, Tysza [1 ]
Culbertson, Michael J. [1 ]
Carlson, Crystal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Educ Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
evaluation methodology; focus group evidence; focus group design and analysis; participant interaction in focus groups; GROUP-DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1177/1098214013508300
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In evaluation and applied social research, focus groups may be used to gather different kinds of evidence (e. g., opinion, tacit knowledge). In this article, we argue that making focus group design choices explicitly in relation to the type of evidence required would enhance the empirical value and rigor associated with focus group utilization. We offer a descriptive framework to highlight contrasting design characteristics and the type of evidence they generate. We present examples of focus groups from education and healthcare evaluations to illustrate the relationship between focus group evidence, design, and how focus groups are conducted. To enhance the credibility of focus group evidence and maximize potential learning from this popular qualitative data collection method, we offer a set of questions to guide evaluators reflection and decision making about focus group design and implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 345
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design of a Mindfulness Virtual Community: A focus-group analysis
    El Morr, Christo
    Maule, Catherine
    Ashfaq, Iqra
    Ritvo, Paul
    Ahmad, Farah
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (03) : 1560 - 1576
  • [2] Focus group analysis of hand-held radiation detector design
    Savory, Paul
    Crowe, James V.
    Hallbeck, M. Susan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2012, 42 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [3] What is wellbeing for rural South African women? Textual analysis of focus group discussion transcripts and implications for programme design and evaluation
    Ferrari, Giulia
    [J]. HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [4] What is wellbeing for rural South African women? Textual analysis of focus group discussion transcripts and implications for programme design and evaluation
    Giulia Ferrari
    [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9
  • [5] RESEARCH DESIGN IMPLICATIONS FROM A SURVEY AND FOCUS GROUP OF IBS SUFFERERS AT A SPECIALISED PATIENT CONFERENCE
    Etherson, K. J.
    Mason, J. M.
    Emmett, C.
    Yiannakou, Y.
    [J]. GUT, 2015, 64 : A146 - A147
  • [6] A Grounded Qualitative Analysis of the Effect of a Focus Group on Design Process in a Virtual Internship
    Markovetz, Matthew R.
    Sullivan, Sean
    Clark, Renee M.
    Swiecki, Zachari
    Irgens, Golnaz Arastoopour
    Shaffer, David W.
    Chesler, Naomi C.
    Bodnar, Cheryl A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2017, 33 (06) : 1834 - 1841
  • [7] USING FOCUS GROUP METHODOLOGY FOR ERGONOMIC DESIGN
    CAPLAN, S
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1990, 33 (05) : 527 - 533
  • [8] CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PLASMA-FOCUS DESIGN BASED ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF AN UPPER PRESSURE LIMIT
    MILANESE, M
    POUZO, J
    [J]. NUCLEAR FUSION, 1985, 25 (07) : 840 - 846
  • [9] Sense of Belonging and Evidence Learning: A Focus Group Study
    Baixinho, Cristina Lavareda
    Ferreira, Oscar Ramos
    Medeiros, Marcelo
    Oliveira, Ellen Synthia Fernandes
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [10] The Sequential-Funnel-Based Focus Group Design: Adapting the Focus Group for Research in Sport Management
    Abeza, Gashaw
    O'Reilly, Norm
    Seguin, Benoit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL SPORT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 7 (01) : 43 - 70