Regionwide sharing for Status 1 liver patients - Beneficial impact on waiting time and pre- and posttransplant survival

被引:12
|
作者
Humar, A [1 ]
Khwaja, K [1 ]
Glessing, B [1 ]
Larson, E [1 ]
Asolati, M [1 ]
Durand, B [1 ]
Lake, J [1 ]
Payne, WD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/lt.20161
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
On August 21, 1999, Region 7 of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) adopted a policy of regionwide sharing of cadaver livers for UNOS Status I recipients. We examined what impact this policy had at our center on their waiting times, waiting list mortality, and outcomes. From January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2002, our center listed 39 patients for an emergent (Status 1) transplant, according to the current criteria for Status I listing: patients (adult and pediatric) with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), hepatic artery thrombosis, or primary non-function early after a liver transplant, or critically ill pediatric patients with chronic liver disease. These 39 candidates were analyzed in 2 groups: those listed before regionwide sharing (Group I, n = 19) and those listed after (Group II, n = 20). Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, including mean donor and recipient age, proportion of pediatric patients, and type of graft used (i.e., living or deceased donor, segmental or whole-organ). FHF was the most common cause of liver failure in both groups-74% versus 70% (P = ns). The next most common cause in both groups was hepatic artery thrombosis, followed by primary non-function. Most transplants used deceased donors; however, 2 of the transplants in Group I versus only I in Group 11 used living donors. Waiting list mortality (the patient death rate before a transplant could take place) was 32% in Group I versus only 5% in Group II (P =.03). The mean number of days on the waiting list was also substantially lower in Group II (2.9 days) than in Group I, (5.8 days) (P =.04). For patients who underwent a transplant, graft and patient survival rates at 6 months post-transplant were 69.2% in Group I versus 89.5% in Group 11 (P =.03). In conclusion, the introduction of regionwide sharing seems to have been of benefit for Status I patients at our center. They have a significantly lower risk of dying while waiting for a transplant and undergo one in a much shorter period of time.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 665
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Providing Care Locally Compared to at a Transplant Center for Pre- And Posttransplant Liver Patients.
    Shahbazov, R.
    Knapp, K.
    Tsutsui, S.
    Nickkholgh, A.
    Northup, P.
    Oberholzer, J.
    Maluf, D.
    Shiffman, M.
    Pelletier, S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 : 854 - 854
  • [2] Impact of Regional Organ Sharing and Allocation in the UK Northern Liver Alliance on Waiting Time to Liver Transplantation and Waitlist Survival
    Malik, Abdullah K.
    Masson, Steven
    Allen, Elisa
    Akyol, Murat
    Bathgate, Andrew
    Davies, Mervyn
    Hidalgo, Ernest
    Hudson, Mark
    Powell, James
    Taylor, Rhiannon
    Zarankaite, Agne
    Manas, Derek M.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (11) : 2304 - 2311
  • [3] Increasing waiting times for status 2 patients in new United Network for Organ Sharing allocation system: Impact on waitlist and posttransplant outcomes
    Singh, Sameer K.
    Hassanein, Mohamed
    Ning, Yuming
    Wang, Chunhui
    Kurlansky, Paul
    Clerkin, Kevin
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Uriel, Nir
    Takeda, Koji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 167 (02):
  • [4] The impact of waiting time on survival of kidney transplant patients
    Martin-Reyes, Guillermo
    Cabelllo Diaz, Mercedes
    Sola Moyano, Eugenia
    Burgos, Dolores
    Gutierrez, Cristina
    Lopez, Veronica
    De Teresa, Eduardo
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 22 : 382 - 382
  • [5] Discussion to: Increasing waiting times for status 2 patients in new United Network for Organ Sharing allocation system: Impact on waitlist and posttransplant outcomes
    Singh, Sameer K.
    Whitson, Bryan
    Takeda, Koji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 167 (02): : 544 - 546
  • [6] IMPACT OF INFECTIONS ON WAITING LIST SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH END STAGE LIVER DISEASE
    Alferink, L.
    Metselaar, H.
    Schurink, C.
    Hansen, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 64 : S272 - S272
  • [7] List and Liver Transplant Survival According to Waiting Time in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Salvalaggio, P. R.
    Felga, G.
    Axelrod, D. A.
    Della Guardia, B.
    Almeida, M. D.
    Rezende, M. B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15 (03) : 668 - 677
  • [8] Impact of adult living donor liver transplantation on waiting time survival in candidates listed for liver transplantation
    Russo, MW
    Lapointe-Rudow, D
    Kinkhabwala, M
    Emond, J
    Brown, RS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (03) : 427 - 431
  • [9] Nutritional status of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation: time trends and impact on survival
    Singal, Ashwani K.
    Kamath, Patrick S.
    Francisco Ziller, Nickie
    DiCecco, Sara
    Shoreibah, M.
    Kremers, Walter
    Charlton, Michael R.
    Heimbach, Julie K.
    Watt, Kymberly D.
    Shah, Vijay H.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 (08) : 788 - 794
  • [10] MELD score as a predictor of pretransplant and posttransplant survival in OPTN/UNOS Status 1 patients
    Kremers, WK
    van IJperen, M
    Kim, WR
    Freeman, RB
    Harper, AM
    Kamath, PS
    Wiesner, RH
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 39 (03) : 764 - 769