Regime differences and industry heterogeneity of the volatility transmission from the energy price to the PPI

被引:9
|
作者
He, Yongda [1 ]
Lin, Boqiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Management, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Energy Econ & Energy Polic, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Energy price; Producer price index; Industry heterogeneity; Markov regime-switching model; NONLINEAR GRANGER CAUSALITY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; OIL PRICES; STOCK-PRICES; TIME-SERIES; US ECONOMY; REAL-TIME; SHOCKS; CONSUMPTION; INFLATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.025
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Using the monthly Producer Price Index (PPI) of 37 different industries in China from 2007 to 2017, this study established a Markov regime -switching model to analyze the regime differences and industry heterogeneity of the transmission of volatility from energy price to PPI. The results showed that volatility in energy prices within a given regime has a relatively high "inertia". Regardless of being in a high- or low-volatility regime, volatility in energy prices was found to have a positive transmission effect on the PPI. In addition, the transmission coefficients of the low-volatility regime tended to be higher than the transmission coefficients of the high-volatility regime, Further analysis revealed that the impact of the volatility in energy prices on the PPI of factors of production was significantly greater than the impact on the PPI of consumer products. Furthermore, in terms of industry heterogeneity, the transmission coefficients of energy and resource industries were found to be the greatest, followed by energy- and resource-intensive industries, and labor-intensive industries; the transmission coefficients of technology- and capital-intensive industries were the lowest. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 916
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regime-switching energy price volatility: The role of economic policy uncertainty
    Scarcioffolo, Alexandre R.
    Etienne, Xiaoli L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 76 : 336 - 356
  • [2] Asymmetric price volatility transmission between food and energy markets: The case of Spain
    Abdelradi, Fadi
    Serra, Teresa
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 46 (04) : 503 - 513
  • [3] Price volatility and price transmission in perishable commodity markets: evidence from Chinese lychee markets
    Zheng, Xuyun
    Pan, Zheng
    Zhuang, Lijuan
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (09) : 748 - 752
  • [4] Stability in the banking industry and commodity price volatility: perspective from developing economies
    Abaidoo, Rexford
    Agyapong, Elvis Kwame
    Boateng, Kwame Fosu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 39 (04) : 988 - 1012
  • [5] Grain Price and Volatility Transmission from International to Domestic Markets in Developing Countries
    Ceballos, Francisco
    Hernandez, Manuel A.
    Minot, Nicholas
    Robles, Miguel
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 94 : 305 - 320
  • [6] Industry Volatility and Employment Extreme Risk Transmission: Evidence from China
    Lin, Ling
    Li, Qiumei
    Li, Jin
    Zhang, Zuominyang
    Zhong, Xuan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [7] The Role of Energy on the Price Volatility of Fruits and Vegetables: Evidence from Turkey
    Ucak, Harun
    Yelgen, Esin
    Ari, Yakup
    [J]. BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 11 (01): : 37 - 54
  • [8] An attribution analysis of soybean price volatility in China: global market connectedness or energy market transmission?
    Zhang, Youwang
    Li, Chongguang
    Xu, Yuanyuan
    Li, Jian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 24 (01): : 15 - 25
  • [9] Do energy prices stimulate food price volatility? Examining volatility transmission between US oil, ethanol and corn markets
    Gardebroek, Cornelis
    Hernandez, Manuel A.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 : 119 - 129