Is there a green premium in the green bond market? Systematic literature review revealing premium determinants

被引:142
|
作者
MacAskill, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Roca, E. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, B. [1 ,2 ]
Stewart, R. A. [1 ,3 ]
Sahin, O. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Cities Res Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Griffith Business Sch, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Nathan, Qld, Australia
关键词
Green bonds; Green economy; Environmental risk; Socially responsible investment;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124491
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The green bond market is emerging as an impactful financing mechanism in climate change mitigation efforts. Studies investigating this market have revealed the notion of a 'green premium' or 'greenium' within green bond pricing, including insights into influential characteristics and drivers that govern it. However, methodological heterogeneity among these studies has resulted in general ambiguity regarding a consensus over the existence of the green premium. This research addresses this gap through a systematic literature review with the aim of establishing a consensus on the existence, or nonexistence, of a green premium in the green bond market. The review examines studies published between 2007 and 2019. A ranking of the green bond characteristics most likely to exhibit a green premium is organised, including a framework of driving factors. The findings confirm a consensus on the existence of a green premium within 56% of primary and 70% of secondary market studies, particularly for those green bonds that are government issued, investment grade, and that follow defined green bond governance and reporting procedures. The green premium varies widely for the primary market; however, an average greenium of -1 to -9 basis points on the secondary market is observed. Overall, our findings highlight the crucial role of strengthening environmental preferences amongst bond market participants; including implications for bond pricing theory, by suggesting that future bond pricing should consider noneconomic motives of investors, such as environmental preferences; and, for future growth implications as a catalyst towards the financing of climate change mitigation efforts globally. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The green corporate bond issuance premium
    Caramichael, John
    Rapp, Andreas C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2024, 162
  • [2] Do investors in Green Bond market pay a premium? Global evidence
    Nanayakkara, Madurika
    Colombage, Sisira
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (40) : 4425 - 4437
  • [3] Effects of the utilization of green bonds proceeds on green bond premium
    Okafor, Anthony
    Adusei, Michael
    Edo, Onome Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 469
  • [4] Green Premium in the Tokyo Office Rent Market
    Onishi, Junichiro
    Deng, Yongheng
    Shimizu, Chihiro
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [5] LITERATURE REVIEW ON GREEN COST PREMIUM ELEMENTS OF SUSTAINABLE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
    Russ, Nazirah Mat
    Hamid, Mahanim
    Ye, Kho Mei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 9 (08) : 1715 - 1725
  • [6] No premium for green energy
    不详
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 12 (05) : 8 - 8
  • [7] Where's the green bond premium? Evidence from China
    Li, Quan
    Zhang, Kai
    Wang, Li
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 48
  • [8] "Green Companies" and Financial Performance: The Green Premium
    Kranias, Athanasios
    Psychoyios, Dimitrios
    Refenes, Apostolos-Paul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 96
  • [9] Premium Tissue goes Green
    不详
    [J]. WOCHENBLATT FUR PAPIERFABRIKATION, 2012, 140 (09): : 698 - 699
  • [10] Is the Korean green premium in equilibrium?
    Eom, Yunsung
    Kang, Young Dae
    Sohn, Wook
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 92 : 245 - 260