Levomepromazine versus chlorpromazine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a double-blind randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Lal, S
Thavundayil, JX
Nair, NPV
Annable, L
Kin, NY
Gabriel, A
Schwartz, G
机构
[1] Douglas Hosp, Res Ctr, Verdun, PQ H4H 1R3, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[3] Montreal Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE | 2006年 / 31卷 / 04期
关键词
chlorpromazine; haloperidol; levomepromazine; schizophrenia; treatment resistance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective: We compared the effect of levomepromazine (LMP) with chlorpromazine (CPZ) in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Methods: We carried out a double-blind, parallel group study (n = 19/arm) with balanced randomization in blocks of 4 and stratification by sex. Subjects entered a 30-week trial, of which phases I-III were open: phase I (wk 0-6) baseline; phase II (wk 7-9) stepwise transition to haloperidol (HAL), 30 mg/d, plus benztropine (BT), 4 mg/d; phase III (wk 10-15) HAL, 40-60 mg/d, plus BT, 4-6 mg/d; phase IV (wk 16-20) stepwise transition to LMP or CPZ (500 mg/d) following randomization; phase V (wk 21-28) stepwise increase of LMP or CPZ (600-1000 mg/d, dose reduction permitted) to establish optimum dose; and phase VI (wk 29-30) optimized dose maintained. Criteria for TRS were based on those established by Kane et al in 1988. The criterion for a response to treatment was a reduction of 25% or more in total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score. Results: Both LMP (p = 0.007) and CPZ (p = 0.030) improved TRS relative to baseline. Although there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in treatment response at study end point, hierarchical linear modelling of longitudinal outcome revealed a significant (p = 0.006) advantage of LMP over CPZ for the BPRS total score. Ten of 19 participants on LMP and 8 of 19 on CPZ met the criterion for treatment response, and 9 of the 18 responders did so on 200-700 mg/d phenothiazine. The mean dose of responders was 710 (standard deviation [SD] 265) mg/d (LMP) and 722 (SD 272) mg/d (CPZ). Akathisia was associated with a nonresponse to phenothiazines ( p= 0.010). BPRS scores increased significantly on HAL (p = 0.006). Two of 19 participants on LMP and 5 of 19 on CPZ withdrew early from the study. Conclusion: LMP and CPZ may be useful in the management of TRS. A modest advantage of LMP compared with CPZ was seen in longitudinal analysis. High doses of neuroleptics may contribute to TRS; reduction of neuroleptics to modest or moderate doses should be considered before categorizing a patient as treatment resistant.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 279
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risperidone versus clozapine in treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenia: A randomized double-blind study
    Bondolfi, G
    Dufour, H
    Patris, M
    May, JP
    Billeter, U
    Eap, CB
    Baumann, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 155 (04): : 499 - 504
  • [2] CLOZAPINE FOR THE TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIC - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON WITH CHLORPROMAZINE
    KANE, J
    HONIGFELD, G
    SINGER, J
    MELTZER, H
    ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 45 (09) : 789 - 796
  • [3] Aripiprazole for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparison study versus perphenazine
    Kane, John M.
    Meltzer, Herbert Y.
    Carson, William H., Jr.
    McQuade, Robert D.
    Marcus, Ronald N.
    Sanchez, Raymond
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 68 (02) : 213 - 223
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of Yokukansan in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Miyaoka, Tsuyoshi
    Furuya, Motohide
    Horiguchi, Jun
    Wake, Rei
    Hashioka, Sadayuki
    Thoyama, Masaya
    Murotani, Kenta
    Mori, Norio
    Minabe, Yoshio
    Iyo, Masaomi
    Ueno, Shuichi
    Ezoe, Sachiko
    Hoshino, Syuzo
    Seno, Haruo
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 2015
  • [5] Topiramate add-on in treatment-resistant schizophrenia:: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial
    Tiihonen, J
    Halonen, P
    Wahlbeck, K
    Repo-Tiihonen, E
    Hyvärinen, S
    Eronen, M
    Putkonen, H
    Takala, P
    Mehtonen, IP
    Puck, M
    Oksanen, J
    Koskelainen, P
    Joffe, G
    Aer, J
    Hallikainen, T
    Ryynänen, IP
    Tupala, E
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 66 (08) : 1012 - 1015
  • [6] Olanzapine versus flupentixol in the treatment of inpatients with schizophrenia: A randomized double-blind trial
    Dittmann, RW
    Geuppert, MS
    Diehl, A
    Hubrich, P
    Maraz, A
    Gattaz, WF
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2001, 49 (1-2) : 225 - 225
  • [7] Olanzapine versus flupenthixol in the treatment of inpatients with schizophrenia: A randomized double-blind trial
    Gattaz, WF
    Diehl, A
    Geuppert, MS
    Hubrich, P
    Schmitt, A
    Linde, I
    Maras, A
    Dittmann, RW
    PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2004, 37 (06) : 279 - 285
  • [8] Double-blind randomized controlled trial of deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant AUD
    Mann, K.
    Bach, P.
    Bogerts, B.
    Kuhn, J.
    ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 47 : 392 - 392
  • [9] DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF THIOTHIXENE AND CHLORPROMAZINE IN ACUTE SCHIZOPHRENIA
    RICKELS, K
    BYRDY, H
    VALENTINE, J
    POSTEL, W
    NORSTAD, N
    DOWNING, R
    INTERNATIONAL PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 1978, 13 (01): : 50 - 57
  • [10] IS LEVOMEPROMAZINE A USEFUL DRUG IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA
    LAL, S
    NAIR, NPV
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 85 (03) : 243 - 245