Optic Disc Progression in Glaucoma: Comparison of Confocal Scanning Laser Tomography to Optic Disc Photographs in a Prospective Study

被引:46
|
作者
Chauhan, Balwantray C. [1 ]
Hutchison, Donna M. [1 ]
Artes, Paul H. [1 ]
Caprioli, Joseph [2 ]
Jonas, Jost B. [3 ]
LeBlanc, Raymond P. [1 ]
Nicolela, Marcelo T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jules Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Heidelberg, Fac Clin Med, Dept Ophthalmol, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
HEIDELBERG-RETINA-TOMOGRAPH; VISUAL-FIELD PROGRESSION; TEST-RETEST VARIABILITY; HEAD TOPOGRAPHY IMAGES; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; NERVE HEAD; COHERENCE TOMOGRAPH; AUTOMATED-ANALYSIS; STEREOPHOTOGRAPHS; PERIMETRY;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.08-2457
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To compare confocal scanning laser tomography (CSLT) to optic disc photography for detecting progressive glaucomatous disc changes. METHODS. Four expert observers first examined a training set of 40 pairs of monoscopic disc photographs to help set a criterion for change. They then classified 44 pairs of monoscopic photographs of patients followed prospectively as having either definitely no change, probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 0, 1, 2, or 3, respectively). Observers were unaware that 10 pairs were photographs of fellow eyes obtained the same day to measure specificity. These patients were imaged with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph every 6 months. Topographic change analysis (TCA) software with three criteria (yielding specificity of 81%, 94%, or 97%) was used. Comparisons between the TCA results and those of observers were made for a range of liberal to conservative criteria and for individual and combined observer scores. RESULTS. The median follow-up was 9.0 years with 18 CSLT images. Observer specificity varied from 50% to 90% (using score 0) and 60% to 100% (using score 0 or 1). Interobserver k ranged from 0.22 to 0.38 from the most liberal to conservative criterion and was generally higher than corresponding TCA-observer agreement. For most criteria, observers had either a high hit rate with low specificity or high specificity with a low hit rate compared with the TCA. Similar results were obtained when observer scores were combined to derive a broader range of criteria. CONCLUSIONS. The results indicate that the TCA performs at least as well as either the individual or best combination of observer classifications of disc photographs. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50: 1682-1691) DOI:10.1167/iovs.08-2457
引用
收藏
页码:1682 / 1691
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis by confocal scanning laser tomography of the optic disc
    Mardin, CY
    Horn, FK
    Jonas, JB
    Budde, WM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 83 (03) : 299 - 304
  • [3] Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma - Comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography
    Chauhan, BC
    McCormick, TA
    Nicolela, MT
    LeBlanc, RP
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 119 (10) : 1492 - 1499
  • [4] Detection of glaucomatous optic disc hemorrhages by confocal scanning laser tomography
    Dichtl, A
    Jonas, JB
    Mardin, CY
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 115 (06) : 800 - 801
  • [5] Reproducibility of evaluation of optic disc change for glaucoma with stereo optic disc photographs
    Miglior, S
    Zeyen, T
    Pfeiffer, N
    Cunha-Vaz, J
    Linsen, MC
    Pellicci, L
    Janssens, A
    van der Veken, A
    Nerinckx, F
    Boeyden, V
    Czupper, M
    Wendrix, G
    Detry-Morel, M
    Kestelyn, P
    Van den Abeele, K
    Jacobs, K
    Decock, C
    Goethals, M
    Pourjavan, S
    Maris, K
    Deghislage, C
    Kersten, I
    Vogel, A
    Herkel, U
    Schwenn, O
    Maser-Wahle, M
    Funk, J
    Schmidt, B
    Akbariyeh, N
    Burk, R
    Thomsen, A
    Grehn, F
    Marquardt, D
    Orzalesi, N
    Rossetti, L
    Ferrante, M
    Mandelli, L
    Marini, S
    Bertoni, G
    Blini, M
    De Molfetta, M
    Bonomi, L
    Morbio, R
    Marraffa, M
    Maraini, G
    Gandolfi, S
    Williams, S
    Cimino, L
    Dondi, P
    Lumbroso, B
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (02) : 340 - 344
  • [6] CORRELATION OF VISUAL-FIELD WITH SCANNING CONFOCAL LASER OPTIC DISC MEASUREMENTS IN GLAUCOMA
    BRIGATTI, L
    CAPRIOLI, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 113 (09) : 1191 - 1194
  • [7] Assessment of optic disc photographs for glaucoma by UK optometrists: the Moorfields Optic Disc Assessment Study (MODAS)
    Hadwin, Shona E.
    Redmond, Tony
    Garway-Heath, David F.
    Lemij, Hans G.
    Reus, Nicolaas J.
    Ward, Gavin
    Anderson, Roger S.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2013, 33 (05) : 618 - 624
  • [8] Evaluation of the influence of tilt of optic disc on the measurement of optic disc variables obtained by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy
    Park, CY
    Kim, YT
    Kee, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2005, 14 (03) : 210 - 214
  • [9] Detection of Glaucoma Progression on Optic Disc Photographs (DP) with Deep Learning
    Mohammadzadeh, Vahid
    Broering, Alex
    Vepa, Arvind
    Pan, Zehao
    Oyler-Yaniv, Alon
    Salazar, Diana
    Nezhad, Golnoush Sadat Mahmoudi
    Martinyan, Jack
    Morales, Esteban
    Caprioli, Joseph
    Scalzo, Fabien
    Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [10] Optic disc hemorrhages and progression in glaucoma
    Niyadurupola, Nuwan
    Broadway, David C.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 5 (05) : 637 - 643