Therapeutic monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplant recipients -: Is it necessary?

被引:34
|
作者
Mourad, M
Wallemacq, P
König, J
de Frahan, EH
Eddour, DC
De Meyer, M
Malaise, J
Squifflet, JP
机构
[1] Univ Catholique Louvain, Hosp St Luc, Dept Kidney & Pancreas Transplantat, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Catholique Louvain, Hosp St Luc, Dept Clin Chem, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00003088-200241050-00001
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Adequate immunosuppression minimising the risk of organ rejection with acceptable tolerability of the used drugs is a crucial step in organ transplantation. The primary goal is to maintain a consistent time-dependent target concentration by tailoring individual dosage leading to the best efficacy and tolerability combination. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimise immunosuppressive therapy is routinely employed for maintenance drugs such as cyclosporin and tacrolimus. The question whether therapeutic monitoring of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in organ transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil is necessary is not definitely answered. The correlation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters with efficacy and toxicity makes the therapeutic monitoring of this drug promising. However, further studies are mandatory to draw the best guidelines in order to achieve higher levels of evidence that MPA-TDM may improve patient outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 327
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Therapeutic Monitoring of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Organ Transplant RecipientsIs It Necessary?
    Michel Mourad
    Pierre Wallemacq
    Josiane König
    Evelyne Henry de Frahan
    Djamila Chaib Eddour
    Martine De Meyer
    Jacques Malaise
    Jean Paul Squifflet
    [J]. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2002, 41 : 319 - 327
  • [2] Tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplant recipients
    Schweizer, RT
    Meisterling, LD
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (03) : 2309 - 2309
  • [3] Defining algorithms for efficient therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients
    Kaczmarek, Ingo
    Bigdeli, Amir K.
    Vogeser, Michael
    Mueller, Thomas
    Beiras-Fernandez, Andres
    Kaczmarek, Peter
    Schmoeckel, Michael
    Meiser, Bruno
    Reichart, Bruno
    Ueberfuhr, Peter
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2008, 30 (04) : 419 - 427
  • [4] Mycophenolate mofetil pharmacokinetic monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant recipients
    Ghio, L
    Ferraresso, M
    Viganó, SM
    Ginevri, F
    Perfumo, F
    Gianoglio, B
    Murer, L
    Zacchello, G
    Dello Strologo, L
    Cardillo, M
    Tirelli, S
    Valente, U
    Edefonti, A
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (02) : 856 - 858
  • [5] The use of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant recipients
    Mele, TS
    Halloran, PF
    [J]. IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 47 (2-3): : 215 - 245
  • [6] Therapeutic monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil
    Jeong, Hyunyoung
    Kaplan, Bruce
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 2 (01): : 184 - 191
  • [7] Pregnancy outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients with exposure to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus
    Sifontis, Nicole M.
    Coscia, Lisa A.
    Constantinescu, Serban
    Lavelanet, Antonella F.
    Moritz, Michael J.
    Armenti, Vincent T.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 82 (12) : 1698 - 1702
  • [8] Therapeutic equivalence of mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients
    Salvadori, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3245 - 3247
  • [9] Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolate Mofetil in heart transplant recipients
    Seebacher, G
    Mallinger, R
    Laufer, G
    Grimm, M
    Griesmacher, A
    Weigel, G
    Wolner, E
    Müller, MM
    [J]. PURINE AND PYRIMIDINE METABOLISM IN MAN IX, 1998, 431 : 801 - 803
  • [10] Measurement of mycophenolate mofetil effect in transplant recipients
    Ogawa, N
    Nagashima, N
    Nakamura, M
    Shalabi, A
    Maley, WR
    Burdick, JF
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (03) : 422 - 427