Hypofractionated intensity-modulated arc therapy for lymph node metastasized prostate cancer: Early late toxicity and 3-year clinical outcome

被引:25
|
作者
Fonteyne, Valerie [1 ]
Lumen, Nicolaas [3 ]
Ost, Piet [1 ]
Van Praet, Charles [3 ]
Vandecasteele, Katrien [1 ]
Ir, Werner De Gersem [1 ]
Villeirs, Geert [2 ]
De Neve, Wilfried [1 ]
Decaestecker, Karel [3 ]
De Meerleer, Gert [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Lymph node positive prostate cancer; Outcome; Pelvic radiotherapy; Toxicity; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; HORMONAL-THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DOSE-ESCALATION; RADIOTHERAPY; RISK; RECURRENCE; MORTALITY; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: For patients with N1 prostate cancer (PCa) aggressive local therapies can be advocated. We evaluated clinical outcome, gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) toxicity after intensity modulated arc radiotherapy (IMAT) + androgen deprivation (AD) for N1 PCa. Material and methods: Eighty patients with T1-4N1M0 PCa were treated with IMAT and 2-3 years of AD. A median dose of 69.3 Gy (normalized isoeffective dose at 2 Gy per fraction: 80 Gy [alpha/beta = 3]) was prescribed in 25 fractions to the prostate. The pelvic lymph nodes received a minimal dose of 45 Gy. A simultaneous integrated boost to 72 Gy and 65 Gy was delivered to the intraprostatic lesion and/or pathologically enlarged lymph nodes, respectively. GI and GU toxicity was scored using the RTOG/RILIT and RTOG-SOMA/LENT-CTC toxicity scoring system respectively. Three-year actuarial risk of grade 2 and 3/4 GI-GU toxicity and biochemical and clinical relapse free survival (bRFS and cRFS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier statistics. Results: Median follow-up was 36 months. Three-year actuarial risk for late grade 3 and 2 GI toxicity is 8% and 20%, respectively. Three-year actuarial risk for late grade 3-4 and 2 GU toxicity was 6% and 34%, respectively. Actuarial 3-year bRFS and cRFS was 81% and 89%, respectively. Actuarial 3-year bRFS and cRFS was, respectively 26% and 32% lower for patients with cN1 disease when compared to patients with cN0 disease. Conclusion: IMAT for N1 PCa offers good clinical outcome with moderate toxicity. Patients with cN1 disease have poorer outcome. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 234
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HYPOFRACTIONATED INTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY FOR LYMPH NODE METASTASIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    De Gersem, Werner
    De Neve, Wilfried
    Jacobs, Filip
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Vandecasteele, Katrien
    Villeirs, Geert
    De Meerleer, Gert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (04): : 1013 - 1020
  • [2] HIGH DOSE INTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY (IMAT) AS PRIMARY THERAPY FOR LYMPH NODE METASTASIZED PROSTATE CANCER: FEASIBILITY AND REPORT ON ACUTE AND LATE TOXICITY
    Fonteyne, V.
    Villeirs, G.
    Ost, P.
    Vandecasteele, K.
    De Neve, W.
    De Meerleer, G.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S402 - S403
  • [3] Late Toxicity of Moderately Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Treating the Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Nodes for High Risk Prostate Cancer
    Choo, Richard
    Hillman, David W.
    Mitchell, Cecilia
    Daniels, Thomas
    Vargas, Carlos
    Rwigema, Jean Claude
    Corbin, Kimberly
    Keole, Sameer
    Vora, Sujay
    Merrell, Kenneth
    Stish, Bradley
    Pisansky, Thomas
    Davis, Brian J.
    Amundson, Adam
    Wong, William
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 115 (05): : 1085 - 1094
  • [4] DOSE-VOLUME CHARACTERISTICS AND ACUTE TOXICTY OF HYPOFRACTIONATED INTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY (IMAT) plus ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION (AD) AS PRIMARY THERAPY FOR LYMPH NODE METASTASIZED PROSTATE CANCER.
    De Neve, W.
    Fonteyne, V.
    Villeirs, G.
    De Wagter, C.
    Jacobs, F.
    Vandecasteele, K.
    Ost, R.
    De Meerleer, G.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S321 - S322
  • [5] Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer confined to the pelvis: analysis of efficacy and late toxicity
    Liu, Yue-Ping
    Gray, Phillip J.
    Jin, Jing
    Wang, Wei-Hu
    Fang, Hui
    Wang, Shu-Lian
    Song, Yong-Wen
    Ren, Hua
    Liu, Xin-Fan
    Yu, Zi-Hao
    Dai, Jian-Rong
    Li, Ye-Xiong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 4 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [6] Acute and Late Toxicity after Hypofractionated Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Akimoto, T.
    Kiyozuka, M.
    Nasu, S.
    Motegi, A.
    Nakamura, K.
    Hashimoto, Y.
    Maebayashi, K.
    Hanyu, Y.
    Tanabe, K.
    Mitsuhashi, N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S334 - S335
  • [7] Acute toxicity of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Drodge, C. S.
    Boychak, O.
    Patel, S.
    Usmani, N.
    Amanie, J.
    Parliament, M. B.
    Murtha, A.
    Field, C.
    Ghosh, S.
    Pervez, N.
    [J]. Current Oncology, 2015, 22 (02) : E76 - E84
  • [8] Clinical outcomes and late toxicity of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer.
    Wang, Michael
    Pearcey, Robert
    Pervez, Nadeem
    Yee, Don
    Mihai, Alina
    Patel, Samir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06)
  • [9] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on 3-Year Toxicity
    Paydar, Ima
    Pepin, Abigail
    Cyr, Robyn A.
    King, Joseph
    Yung, Thomas M.
    Bullock, ElizabethG.
    Lei, Siyuan
    Satinsky, Andrew
    Harter, K. William
    Suy, Simeng
    Dritschilo, Anatoly
    Lynch, John H.
    Kole, Thomas P.
    Collins, Sean P.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 7
  • [10] Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy and Anal Cancer: Clinical Outcome and Late Toxicity Assessment
    De Francesco, I.
    Thomas, K.
    Wedlake, L.
    Tait, D.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) : 604 - 610