Analysis of CO2 transmission pipelines for CO2 enhanced oil recovery networks: gas field X to oil field Y

被引:3
|
作者
Jatmoko, Faisal Adi [1 ]
Kusrini, Eny [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia
[2] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Trop Renewable Energy Ctr, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia
来源
3RD INTERNATIONAL TROPICAL RENEWABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TROPICAL RENEWABLE ENERGY (I-TREC 2018) | 2018年 / 67卷
关键词
D O I
10.1051/e3sconf/20186704009
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to analyze the CO2 transmission pipeline from gas field X to oil field Y by comparing alternative routes, CO2 phases, design parameters, equipment used and economic aspects, with the objective of identifying the most efficient transmission system. The 100 MSCFD of CO2 that is normally removed from gas field X will be used and transmitted to oil field Y for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). CO2 can be transported in three phases gas, fluid or dense vapour. Because of the corrosive properties of CO2 when in contact with water, materials with high corrosion resistance, such stainless steel or reinforced carbon, should be used. Stainless steel is commonly used for the transport of corrosive fluids such as CO2 but is expensive, while the least expensive material commonly used is reinforced fibre; however, this material has low strength at high pressure. On the other hand, while carbon steel is known for its high strength and durability it has poor resistance to corrosion. Therefore, the selection of materials for pipeline construction and the design parameters applied will be studied here to determine the best option for CO2 transmission. For comparison, two alternative routes, one with existing rights of way (the ROW route) and one all-new route, will be compared with each other. Then, CO2 phase transmission will be compared for liquid, gas and dense vapour phases, together with the design parameters applied and required equipment. Pipe diameter will be calculated along with pipe wall thickness and other requirements of parameter design for transmission of CO2. Economic analysis will then be performed for each scenario to ascertain the minimum cost while still meeting necessary technical requirements. Capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX) and other variables will be investigated and analyzed using sensitivity testing to determine the influence of each component variation on each CO2 transmission pipeline. From the analysis applied to each scenario the optimal pipeline transmission scenarios in terms of design and cost to meet the CO2 enhanced oil-recovery network needs for gas field X to oil field Y will be obtained.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CO2 sequestration through enhanced oil recovery in a mature oil field
    Gaspar Ravagnani, A. T. F. S.
    Ligero, E. L.
    Suslick, S. B.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 65 (3-4) : 129 - 138
  • [2] Integrated simulation system of CO2 gas injection application for enhanced oil recovery in the oil field
    Dedy Kristanto
    Yulius Deddy Hermawan
    Yusmardhany Hariyadi
    Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2020, 10 : 3917 - 3923
  • [3] Evaluation of Future CO2 Injection in Denver City Field for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage
    Mukhtar, Muhammad Haseeb
    Ehlig-Economides, Christine
    Behm, Ed
    Zargar, Zeinab
    Lawson, Jacob
    Saihood, Tariq
    Yao, Shengyu
    Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2024, 2024-April
  • [4] Flue gas CO2 recovery and compression cost study for CO2 enhanced oil recovery
    Iijima, M
    Kamijo, T
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 109 - 114
  • [5] CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery at Depleted Oil/Gas Reservoirs
    Dai, Zhenxue
    Viswanathan, Hari
    Xiao, Ting
    Middleton, Richard
    Pan, Feng
    Ampomah, William
    Yang, Changbing
    Zhou, Youqin
    Jia, Wei
    Lee, Si-Yong
    Cather, Martha
    Balch, Robert
    McPherson, Brian
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 6957 - 6967
  • [6] Storing CO2 with Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Ferguson, Robert C.
    Nichols, Christopher
    Van Leeuwen, Tyler
    Kuuskraa, Vello A.
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 1989 - 1996
  • [7] On the sustainability of CO2 storage through CO2 - Enhanced oil recovery
    Farajzadeh, R.
    Eftekhari, A. A.
    Dafnomilis, G.
    Lake, L. W.
    Bruining, J.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 261
  • [8] CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites
    Dai, Zhenxue
    Viswanathan, Hari
    Middleton, Richard
    Pan, Feng
    Ampomah, William
    Yang, Changbing
    Jia, Wei
    Xiao, Ting
    Lee, Si-Yong
    McPherson, Brian
    Balch, Robert
    Grigg, Reid
    White, Mark
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (14) : 7546 - 7554
  • [9] Risk analysis of oil and gas pipelines subjected to CO2 corrosion
    Singh, Maneesh
    Markeset, Tore
    RISK, RELIABILITY AND SOCIETAL SAFETY, VOLS 1-3: VOL 1: SPECIALISATION TOPICS; VOL 2: THEMATIC TOPICS; VOL 3: APPLICATIONS TOPICS, 2007, : 1991 - 1999
  • [10] Dual Benefits of Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Sequestration: The Impact of CO2 Injection Approach on Oil Recovery
    Alam, Mir Muhammad Mansoor
    Hassan, Amjed
    Mahmoud, Mohamed
    Sibaweihi, Najmudeen
    Patil, Shirish
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10