Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes

被引:79
|
作者
Cortas, GA [1 ]
Mehta, SN [1 ]
Abraham, NS [1 ]
Barkun, AN [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70157-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current recommendations for the use of standard catheters or sphincterotomes for the initial attempt at selective common bile duct cannulation have been made in the absence of prospective comparative data. Methods: A prospective study was carried out in which patients were randomized to undergo cannulation with a standard catheter or a sphincterotome (standard or wire-guided). Multivariate models were constructed to determine significant independent predictors of the success rates of initial and selective cannulation and the number of attempts and time needed to achieve selective cannulation. Results: Eighty-three successive patients were evaluated, 36 were excluded because they had undergone previous therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or a Billroth II operation. Of the 47 patients (28 women, mean age 60.6 +/- 14.5 years), indications for ERCP included suspected bile duct stones in 41 patients, pancreatico-biliary malignancies in 4, and biliary leaks in 2. Eighteen patients were randomized to undergo selective common bile duct cannulation with standard catheter and 29 to standard/wire-guided sphincterotome. Initial common bile duct cannulation for the standard catheter and standard/wire-guided sphincterotome groups wars successful in 12(67% [95% CI: 41%, 87%]) and 28 (97% [95% CI: 82%, 100%]) patients, respectively (95% CI for the difference: -0.57 to -0.03, p = 0.009). Using intention to treat analysis, selective common bile duct cannulation was successful for standard catheter and standard/wire-guided sphincterotome patients in 17(94% [95% CI: 73%, 99%]) and 28 (97% [95% CI: 82%, 100%]) cases, respectively (95% CI for the difference: -0.15 to +0.10, p > 0.05). The mean number of attempts required to achieve selective common bile duct cannulation were 12.4 +/- 6.0 and 2.8 +/- 3.1 (p = 0.0001). The mean time taken to achieve selective common bile duct cannulation was 13.5+/- 6.14 and 3.1 +/- 5.1 minutes (p = 0.0001). Multivariate modeling revealed that the initial choice of catheter was the only significant independent predictor of the time taken and the number of attempts performed to achieve selective common bile duct cannulation (p = 0.0001 for each model). Conclusion: The use of standard/wire-guided sphincterotome was superior to that of standard catheter for the initial attempt at cannulation of the common bile duct. The number of attempts required may bear clinical significance with regard to the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis and warrants further study.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 779
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: A prospective randomized comparative trial of standard catheters versus sphincterotomes.
    Mehta, SN
    Cortas, GA
    Barkun, AN
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (04) : 461 - 461
  • [2] Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: A randomized controlled trial comparing sphincterotomes
    Abraham, NS
    Williams, SP
    Thompson, K
    Love, J
    MacIntosh, D
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (05) : AB185 - AB185
  • [3] The Comparison of Two Different 5.5 Fr Sphincterotomes for Selective Cannulation of the Common Bile Duct: A Prospective, Randomized Study
    Ersan Ozaslan
    Tugrul Purnak
    Cumali Efe
    Nihal Gokbulut Ozaslan
    Mustafa Cengiz
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2014, 59 : 3078 - 3084
  • [4] The Comparison of Two Different 5.5 Fr Sphincterotomes for Selective Cannulation of the Common Bile Duct: A Prospective, Randomized Study
    Ozaslan, Ersan
    Purnak, Tugrul
    Efe, Cumali
    Ozaslan, Nihal Gokbulut
    Cengiz, Mustafa
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (12) : 3078 - 3084
  • [5] 5F sphincterotomes and 4F sphincterotomes are equivalent for the selective cannulation of the common bile duct
    Abraham, NS
    Williams, SP
    Thompson, K
    Love, JR
    MacIntosh, DG
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (04) : 615 - 621
  • [6] Randomized trial comparing the tip of the hydrophilic guide wire for successful deep cannulation of the common bile duct
    Michopoulos, S
    Stamatis, G
    Manthos, G
    Karayiannis, S
    Archavlis, E
    Vlachakis, L
    Archimandritis, A
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (05) : AB213 - AB213
  • [7] Optimizing Bile Duct Cannulation: Randomized Trial of Short vs. Long-Wire Systems and Small vs. Standard Sphincterotomes
    Buxbaum, James L.
    Leonor, Paul
    Tung, Jonathan
    Cho, Daniel
    Sahakian, Ara
    Laine, Loren
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB137 - AB137
  • [8] A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing Early Precut and Standard Approach for Cannulating the Common Bile Duct: An Interim Analysis
    Mariani, Alberto
    Giussani, Antonella
    Di Leo, Milena
    Marini, Mario
    Giardulllo, Nicola
    Buffoli, Federico
    Bianco, Maria Antonia
    Terruzzi, Vittorio
    Testoni, Pier Alberto
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 141 - 141
  • [9] Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP
    Laasch, HU
    Tringali, A
    Wilbraham, L
    Marriott, A
    England, RE
    Mutignani, M
    Perri, V
    Costamagna, G
    Martin, DF
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 35 (08) : 669 - 674
  • [10] Wire-guided selective cannulation of the bile duct with a sphincterotome: a prospective randomized comparative study with the standard method
    Nambu, Tomoko
    Ukita, Takeo
    Shigoka, Hiroaki
    Omuta, Shigefumi
    Maetani, Iruru
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 46 (01) : 109 - 115