Flood risk, land use and private participation in embankment maintenance in Indian Sundarbans

被引:11
|
作者
Sarkhel, Prasenjit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kalyani, Dept Econ, Kalyani, W Bengal, India
关键词
Public good; Embankment maintenance; Voluntary contribution; Uncertainty; Sundarbans; India; SOIL CONSERVATION; COLLECTIVE ACTION; PUBLIC-GOODS; MANAGEMENT; ETHIOPIA; PROVISION; MANGROVES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the complementarities between land productivity and conservation investments in the context of river embankment maintenance in the Indian Sundarbans. The study finds that households whose principal occupation is aquaculture commit more resources to embankment maintenance relative to those in non-aquaculture employment. While conservation efforts are greater in all types of aquaculture plots irrespective of distance from the embankments, such efforts unambiguously decrease for agricultural plots that are located at a distance from the embankments. Private returns to traditional aquaculture are much higher than returns to agriculture, enabling aquaculture households in invest in managing their local public good. However, there is evidence of free riding in canal-based aquaculture when multiple users draw water from a single source. Head-enders with greater wealth as well as intense social networks tend to free-ride while tail-enders with less land holdings contribute more towards canal maintenance. Furthermore, public intervention in embankment maintenance may be crowding out private efforts. Thus, in primarily agricultural areas, productivity-enhancing policies like adoption of salt tolerant crops with supportive extension activities may be more efficient than policies that fully subsidize public good maintenance. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 284
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strategic use of instruments of land policy for mobilising private land for flood risk management
    Loeschner, Lukas
    Hartmann, Thomas
    Priest, Sally
    Collentine, Dennis
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 118 : 45 - 48
  • [2] The role of public participation in encouraging changes in rural land use to reduce flood risk
    Rouillard, J. J.
    Reeves, A. D.
    Heal, K. V.
    Ball, T.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 38 : 637 - 645
  • [3] Land use and flood risk through catchment flood - Management plans
    Burton, AJR
    Shepard, MA
    Riddell, KJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHARTERED INSTITUTION OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2003, 17 (04): : 220 - 225
  • [4] COMPENSATING FLOOD RETENTION ON PRIVATE LAND IN AUSTRIA: TOWARDS POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT?
    Loeschner, Lukas
    Nordbeck, Ralf
    Schindelegger, Arthur
    Seher, Walter
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FRONTIERS, 2019, 7 (03) : 32 - 45
  • [5] Land use, water management and future flood risk
    Wheater, Howard
    Evans, Edward
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 : S251 - S264
  • [6] Land Use Vulnerability towards the Flood Risk in Surakarta City
    Miladan, Nur
    Ariani, Feira
    Pertiwi, Shifa Nurul Indah
    Setiawan, Raafi
    Handayani, Kusumaningdyah Nurul
    [J]. 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT (ICSBE 2018), 2019, 280
  • [7] Use of documentary sources on past flood events for flood risk management and land planning
    Coeur, Denis
    Lang, Michel
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS GEOSCIENCE, 2008, 340 (9-10) : 644 - 650
  • [8] Urban flood risk differentiation under land use scenario simulation
    Zhao, Hongbo
    Gu, Tianshun
    Tang, Junqing
    Gong, Zhaoya
    Zhao, Pengjun
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (04)
  • [9] Impact of forecasted land use changes on flood risk in the Polish Carpathians
    Marcin Szwagrzyk
    Dominik Kaim
    Bronwyn Price
    Agnieszka Wypych
    Ewa Grabska
    Jacek Kozak
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2018, 94 : 227 - 240
  • [10] Role of rural land use management in flood and coastal risk management
    Parrott, A.
    Brooks, W.
    Harmar, O.
    Pygott, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2009, 2 (04): : 272 - 284