Nociception-guided versus Standard Care during Remifentanil-Propofol Anesthesia A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:68
|
作者
Meijer, Fleur S. [1 ]
Martini, Chris H. [1 ]
Broens, Suzanne [1 ]
Boon, Martijn [1 ]
Niesters, Marieke [1 ]
Aarts, Leon [1 ]
Olofsen, Erik [1 ]
van Velzen, Monique [1 ]
Dahan, Albert [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, H5-22,Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
SURGICAL PLETH INDEX; SEVOFLURANE ANESTHESIA; ANALGESIA; LEVEL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0000000000002634
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The multidimensional index of nociception, the nociception level, outperforms blood pressure and heart rate in detection of nociceptive events during anesthesia. We hypothesized that nociception level-guided analgesia reduces opioid consumption and suboptimal anesthesia events such as low blood pressure and use of vasoactive medication. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized study, 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists class I-III adult patients of either sex, scheduled for major abdominal procedures under remifentanil/propofol anesthesia by target-controlled infusion, were included. During the procedure nociception level, noninvasive blood pressure, and heart rate were monitored. Patients were randomized to receive standard clinical care or nociception level-guided analgesia. In the nociception level-guided group, remifentanil concentration was reduced when index values were less than 10 or increased when values were above 25 for at least 1 min, in steps of 0.5 to 1.0 ng/ml. Propofol was titrated to bispectral index values between 45 and 55. The primary outcomes of the study were remifentanil and propofol consumption and inadequate anesthesia events. Results: Compared with standard care, remifentanil administration was reduced in nociception level-guided patients from (mean +/- SD) 0.119 +/- 0.033 to 0.086 +/- 0.032 mu g center dot kg-1 center dot min-1 (mean difference, 0.039 mu g center dot kg-1 center dot min-1; 95% CI, 0.025-0.052 mu g center dot kg-1 center dot min-1; P < 0.001). Among nociception level-guided patients, 2 of 40 (5%) experienced a hypotensive event (mean arterial pressure values less than 55 mm Hg) versus 11 of 40 (28%) patients in the control group (relative risk, 0.271; 95% CI, 0.08-0.77; P = 0.006). In the nociception level-guided group, 16 of 40 (40%) patients received vasoactive medication versus 25 of 40 (63%) patients in the standard care group (relative risk, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.40-0.99; P = 0.044). Conclusions: Nociception level-guided analgesia during major abdominal surgery resulted in 30% less remifentanil consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 755
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analgesia Nociception Index-Guided Remifentanil versus Standard Care during Propofol Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sabourdin, Nada
    Burey, Julien
    Tuffet, Sophie
    Thomin, Anne
    Rousseau, Alexandra
    Al-Hawari, Mossab
    Taconet, Clementine
    Louvet, Nicolas
    Constant, Isabelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [2] Remifentanil-propofol versus fentanyl-propofol for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy
    Ryu, Jung-Hee
    Kim, Jae-Hun
    Park, Kum-Suk
    Do, Sang-Hwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2008, 20 (05) : 328 - 332
  • [3] EEG-derived pain threshold index-guided versus standard care during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
    Jiang, Yu
    Ding, Jian-ming
    Hao, Xi-xi
    Fang, Pan-pan
    Liu, Xue-Sheng
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (08)
  • [4] Remifentanil-propofol versus sufentanil-propofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy:: a randomized trial
    Gerlach, K
    Uhlig, T
    Hüppe, M
    Nowak, G
    Schmitz, A
    Saager, L
    Grasteit, A
    Schmucker, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (10) : 813 - 820
  • [5] Prospective evaluation of remifentanil-propofol mixture for total intravenous anesthesia: A randomized controlled study
    Bakan, Mefkur
    Umutoglu, Tarik
    Topuz, Ufuk
    Guler, Emine Yilmaz
    Uysal, Harun
    Ozturk, Erdogan
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (05)
  • [6] Remifentanil/propofol versus remifentanil/sevoflurane anesthesia in neurosurgery: A prospective randomized trial
    Blumrich, W
    Meyer, K
    Hans, FJ
    Priebe, HJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) : A149 - A149
  • [7] Remifentanil-Propofol for anesthesia of the triple endoscopy of the upper airway during spontaneous ventilation: results of a randomized trial ENDOTANIL
    Besch, G.
    Chopard-Guillemin, A.
    Causeret, A.
    Monnet, E.
    Jurine, A.
    Tavernier, L.
    Samain, E.
    Pili-Floury, S.
    [J]. ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2014, 33 : A258 - A259
  • [8] Nociception level index-guided antinociception versus routine care during remifentanil-propofol anaesthesia for moderate-to-high risk cardiovascular surgery
    Coeckelenbergh, Sean
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Doria, Stefano
    Patricio, Daniel
    Jaubert, Leo
    Huybrechts, Isabelle
    Stefanidis, Constantin
    Kapessidou, Panayota
    Tuna, Turgay
    Engelman, Edgard
    Barvais, Luc
    Perrin, Laurent
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 40 (10) : 790 - 793
  • [9] Brain-based measures of nociception during general anesthesia with remifentanil: A randomized controlled trial
    Karunakaran, Keerthana Deepti
    Kussman, Barry D.
    Peng, Ke
    Becerra, Lino
    Labadie, Robert
    Bernier, Rachel
    Berry, Delany
    Green, Stephen
    Zurakowski, David
    Alexander, Mark E.
    Borsook, David
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (04)
  • [10] Anesthesia recovery comparison between remifentanil-propofol and remifentanil-desflurane guided by Bispectral Index® monitoring
    Rocha, Raphael Grossi
    Almeida, Eduardo Giarola
    Mendes Carneiro, Lara Moreira
    de Almeida, Natalia Farias
    Vilas Boas, Walkiria Wingester
    Gomez, Renato Santiago
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2017, 67 (05): : 500 - 507