Drivers for animal welfare policies in Europe

被引:6
|
作者
Villa, P. Dalla [1 ]
Matthews, L. B.
Alessandrini, B.
Messori, S.
Migliorati, G.
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Abruzzo Molise G Ca, Teramo, Italy
关键词
Animal welfare; Driver collaboration; Ethics; Europe; Harmonisation; Knowledge sharing; Legislation; Policy; Trade;
D O I
10.20506/rst.33.1.2266
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The European region has been, and remains, a global leader in the development of animal welfare policies. The region has a great diversity of cultures and religions, different levels of socio-economic development, and varied legislation, policies and practices. Nevertheless, there are common drivers for animal welfare policy based on a history of animal welfare ethics and obligations to animal users and society in general. A unifying goal of countries in the region is to achieve sustainable compliance with the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) standards on animal health and welfare. Ethics is the overarching driver, supported by the actions of governmental, inter-governmental and non-governmental activities, markets and trade, science and knowledge. Historically, organisations involved in promoting animal welfare have tended to act in isolation. For example, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have run campaigns to influence retailers and the welfare policies of their farmer suppliers. Increasingly, different organisations with common or complementary goals are working together. For example, competent authorities, inter-governmental bodies and NGOs have combined their efforts to address dog population control across several countries in the region. Also, animal welfare is becoming integrated into the corporate social responsibility targets of private companies. Science and knowledge, as drivers and tools, are assisting with the harmonisation of welfare standards, e.g. by providing a common basis for measuring welfare impacts through animal-based measures and widespread sharing of this information. Current trends suggest that there will be greater collaboration among the organisations driving change, and increasing convergence of animal welfare strategies and welfare assessment tools. The result will be increased harmonisation of animal welfare standards throughout the region.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drivers for animal welfare policies in Africa
    Molomo, M.
    Mumba, T.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2014, 33 (01): : 47 - 53
  • [2] Drivers for animal welfare policies in the Middle East
    Aidaros, H.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2014, 33 (01): : 85 - 89
  • [3] Drivers for animal welfare policies in Asia, the Far East and Oceania
    Murray, G.
    Ashley, K.
    Kolesar, R.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2014, 33 (01): : 77 - 83
  • [4] Editorial policies and animal welfare
    Boisvert, DPJ
    [J]. ANIMAL ALTERNATIVES, WELFARE, AND ETHICS, 1997, 27 : 399 - 404
  • [5] ANIMAL WELFARE: POLICIES AND SOCIETY
    Sanchez-Herrera, Francisco
    [J]. ANDULI, 2024, (26):
  • [6] Drivers of animal welfare policy in the Americas
    Huertas, S. M.
    Gallo, C.
    Galindo, F.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2014, 33 (01): : 67 - 76
  • [7] ANIMAL-WELFARE IN EUROPE
    SPEDDING, CRW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 204 (03) : 384 - 387
  • [8] Animal welfare, health policies updated
    不详
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 252 (01): : 27 - 27
  • [9] Global perspectives on animal welfare: Europe
    Caporale, V
    Alessandrini, B
    Dalla Villa, P
    Del Papa, S
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (02): : 567 - 577
  • [10] Designing animal welfare policies and monitoring progress
    Keeling, L. J.
    Immink, V.
    Hubbard, C.
    Garrod, G.
    Edwards, S. A.
    Ingenbleek, P.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2012, 21 : 95 - 105