What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory

被引:56
|
作者
Fiori, Marina [1 ]
Antonietti, Jean-Philippe [2 ]
Mikolajczak, Moira [3 ]
Luminet, Olivier [3 ]
Hansenne, Michel [4 ]
Rossier, Jerome [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Fac Business & Econ, Dept Org Behav, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Fac Social & Polit Sci, Inst Psychol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Psychol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[4] Univ Liege, Dept Psychol, Liege, Belgium
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 06期
关键词
VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0098827
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligence (EI). However, there is scarcity of tests measuring EI as a form of intelligence. The Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, or MSCEIT, is among the few available and the most widespread measure of EI as an ability. This implies that conclusions about the value of EI as a meaningful construct and about its utility in predicting various outcomes mainly rely on the properties of this test. We tested whether individuals who have the highest probability of choosing the most correct response on any item of the test are also those who have the strongest EI ability. Results showed that this is not the case for most items: The answer indicated by experts as the most correct in several cases was not associated with the highest ability; furthermore, items appeared too easy to challenge individuals high in EI. Overall results suggest that the MSCEIT is best suited to discriminate persons at the low end of the trait. Results are discussed in light of applied and theoretical considerations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条