A CT scan protocol for the detection of radiographic loosening of the glenoid component after total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:21
|
作者
Gregory, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Hansen, Ulrich [2 ]
Khanna, Monica [3 ]
Mutchler, Celine [4 ]
Urien, Saik [5 ]
Amis, Andrew A. [2 ,6 ]
Augereau, Bernard [1 ]
Emery, Roger [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 05, European Hosp Georges Pompidou, AP HP, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Paris, France
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
[3] St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
[4] Univ Paris 05, European Hosp Georges Pompidou, AP HP, Dept Radiol, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris 05, European Hosp Georges Pompidou, AP HP, Unite Rech Clin Paris Ctr, Paris, France
[6] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Sch Med, Div Surg & Canc, London, England
[7] St Marys Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, London, England
关键词
SURVIVORSHIP; DESIGN; WEAR;
D O I
10.3109/17453674.2013.869653
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose - It is difficult to evaluate glenoid component periprosthetic radiolucencies in total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) using plain radiographs. This study was performed to evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) using a specific patient position in the CT scanner provides a better method for assessing radiolucencies in TSA. Methods - Following TSA, 11 patients were CT scanned in a lateral decubitus position with maximum forward flexion, which aligns the glenoid orientation with the axis of the CT scanner. Follow-up CT scanning is part of our routine patient care. Glenoid component periprosthetic lucency was assessed according to the Mole score and it was compared to routine plain radiographs by 5 observers. Results - The protocol almost completely eliminated metal artifacts in the CT images and allowed accurate assessment of periprosthetic lucency of the glenoid fixation. Positioning of the patient within the CT scanner as described was possible for all 11 patients. A radiolucent line was identified in 54 of the 55 observed CT scans and osteolysis was identified in 25 observations. The average radiolucent line Mole score was 3.4 (SD 2.7) points with plain radiographs and 9.5 (SD 0.8) points with CT scans (p = 0.001). The mean intra-observer variance was lower in the CT scan group than in the plain radiograph group (p = 0.001). Interpretation - The CT scan protocol we used is of clinical value in routine assessment of glenoid periprosthetic lucency after TSA. The technique improves the ability to detect and monitor radiolucent lines and, therefore, possibly implant loosening also.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 96
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Glenoid Loosening after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An In Vitro CT-Scan Study
    Gregory, Thomas
    Hansen, Ulrich
    Taillieu, Fabienne
    Baring, Toby
    Brassart, Nicolas
    Mutchler, Celine
    Amis, Andrew
    Augereau, Bernard
    Emery, Roger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2009, 27 (12) : 1589 - 1595
  • [2] ARTHROSCOPIC ASSESSMENT OF GLENOID COMPONENT LOOSENING AFTER TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY
    BONUTTI, PM
    HAWKINS, RJ
    SADDEMI, S
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY, 1993, 9 (03): : 272 - 276
  • [3] Radiostereometric and Radiographic Analysis of Glenoid Component Motion After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Streit, Jonathan J.
    Shishani, Yousef
    Greene, Meridith E.
    Nebergall, Audrey K.
    Wanner, John Paul
    Bragdgdon, Charles R.
    Malchau, Henrik
    Gobezie, Reuben
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (10) : E891 - E897
  • [4] Factors affecting cemented glenoid component loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty
    Szabo, Istvan
    Walch, Gilles
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHOULDER SURGERY, 2007, 1 (01): : 23 - 29
  • [5] Revision shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid component loosening
    Cheung, Emilie V.
    Sperling, John W.
    Cofield, Robert H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2008, 17 (03) : 371 - 375
  • [6] Revisions for aseptic glenoid component loosening after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty
    Aibinder, William R.
    Schoch, Bradley
    Schleck, Cathy
    Sperling, John W.
    Cofield, Robert H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (03) : 443 - 449
  • [7] A comparison of onlay versus inlay glenoid component loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty
    Gagliano, Jeffrey R.
    Helms, Sarah M.
    Colbath, Gregory P.
    Przestrzelski, Breanne T.
    Hawkins, Richard J.
    DesJardins, John D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (07) : 1113 - 1120
  • [8] Correlation between radiographic risk for glenoid component loosening and clinical scores in shoulder arthroplasty.
    Merolla G.
    Campi F.
    Paladini P.
    Lollino N.
    Fauci F.
    Porcellini G.
    [J]. MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2009, 93 (Suppl 1) : S29 - 34
  • [9] Determining glenoid component version after total shoulder arthroplasty
    Mehta, Manish P.
    Vogel, Laura A.
    Shiu, Brian B.
    Dennis, Elizabeth R.
    Petkovic, Djuro
    Levine, William N.
    Jobin, Charles M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (09) : 1588 - 1595
  • [10] The incidence of radiographic aseptic loosening of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Gilot, Gregory
    Alvarez-Pinzon, Andres M.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    Flurin, Pierre-Henri
    Krill, Michael
    Routman, Howard D.
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1555 - 1559