Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening

被引:39
|
作者
Caumo, Francesca [1 ]
Romanucci, Giovanna [2 ]
Hunter, Kylie [3 ,4 ]
Zorzi, Manuel [5 ]
Brunelli, Silvia [2 ]
Macaskill, Petra [3 ]
Houssami, Nehmat [3 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Veneto Inst Oncol IOV, Padua, Italy
[2] Osped Marzana, Breast Unit ULSS9, Verona, Italy
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Trials Ctr, NHMRC Clin, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Veneto Reg, Veneto Tumour Registry, Padua, Italy
关键词
Digital breast tomosynthesis; Cancer characteristics; Cancer stage; Mammography; Population screening; 3D-MAMMOGRAPHY; TRIAL; 2D-MAMMOGRAPHY; COMBINATION; FFDM;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-018-4756-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Verona population-based breast cancer (BC) screening program provides biennial mammography to women aged 50-69 years. Based on emerging evidence of enhanced detection, the program transitioned to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening. This is a prospective pilot evaluation of DBT with synthesised 2D mammography screening implemented during April 2015-March 2017; the rate and characteristics of cancers detected at DBT screening were compared with those detected at the preceding digital mammography (DM) screening round (April 2013-March 2015) in the same screening program. Distribution of imaging and tumour characteristics were compared. Amongst 34,071 women screened in the Verona DBT pilot, 315 BCs were detected; 153 BCs were detected amongst 29,360 women in the DM screening round. Estimated CDRs were 9.2/1000 (95% CI 8.3-10.3) DBT screens versus 5.2/1000 (95% CI 4.4-6.1) DM screens, P < 0.001. Statistically significant differences were found in the distribution of whether recall by one/both screen readers (more BCs recalled by both readers at DBT than DM); whether detected on one/two views (higher proportion detected on only one view at DBT than DM); type of radiological lesions; tumour stage, pT and histological categories (lower proportion of DCIS/pTis, higher proportions of pT1a and pT1b, and higher proportion of invasive cancers of special types, at DBT than DM); and tumour grade (higher proportion of grade I at DBT than DM). There were no differences in distributions of nodal and hormone receptor (ER/PR) status. Our findings provide early insights into the extent that transitioning to DBT screening may modify the characteristics of screen-detected breast cancer to inform discussion regarding pros and cons of DBT screening; although our data provide some reassurance that DBT does not increase the proportion of screen-detected DCIS, they highlight mixed findings on comparative tumour characteristics, suggesting a potential for enhancing screening benefit and possibly also over-diagnosis from DBT screening.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 397
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening
    Francesca Caumo
    Giovanna Romanucci
    Kylie Hunter
    Manuel Zorzi
    Silvia Brunelli
    Petra Macaskill
    Nehmat Houssami
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 170 : 391 - 397
  • [2] Comparison of Cancers Detected by Screening Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Destounis, Stamatia
    Arieno, Andrea
    Santacroce, Amanda
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (03) : 339 - 347
  • [3] Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Dang, Pragya A.
    Wang, Aijia
    Senapati, Gunjan M.
    Ip, Ivan K.
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Khorasani, Ramin
    Giess, Catherine S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (03) : 701 - 706
  • [4] Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography
    Lai, Yi-Chen
    Ray, Kimberly M.
    Lee, Amie Y.
    Hayward, Jessica H.
    Freimanis, Rita I.
    Lobach, Iryna V.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 630 - 638
  • [5] Sonographic characteristics of breast cancers detected by supplemental screening US: Comparison with breast cancers seen on screening mammography
    Cho, Nariya
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Chang, Jung Min
    Yi, Ann
    Koo, Hye Ryoung
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (09) : 969 - 976
  • [6] Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening
    Sihto, Hard
    Lundin, Johan
    Lehtimaki, Tina
    Sarlomo-Rikala, Maarit
    Butzow, Ralf
    Holli, Kaija
    Sailas, Liisa
    Kataja, Vesa
    Lundin, Mikael
    Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Thina
    Isola, Jorma
    Heikkila, Paivi
    Joensuu, Heikki
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (13) : 4103 - 4110
  • [7] Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated with 2D Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening-detected and Interval Cancers
    Bahl, Manisha
    Gaffney, Shannon
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Dang, Pragya A.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [8] Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers
    Nam, Kyung Jin
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Ko, Eun Young
    Jeong, Dong Wook
    Choo, Ki Seok
    [J]. BREAST, 2015, 24 (05): : 649 - 655
  • [9] Survival rates for breast cancers detected in a community service screening mammography program
    Sener, SF
    Winchester, DJ
    Brinkmann, E
    Winchester, DP
    Alwawi, E
    Du, H
    Bilimoria, M
    Barrera, E
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 12 (02) : S61 - S61
  • [10] The Natural History of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Mammography
    Zahl, Per-Henrik
    Maehlen, Jan
    Welch, Gilbert
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (21) : 2311 - 2316