Attitudes, experiences, and preferences of ophthalmic professionals regarding routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice

被引:6
|
作者
Robertson, Alexandra O. [1 ]
Tadic, Valerija [1 ,2 ]
Rahi, Jugnoo S. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UCL Great Ormond St GOS Inst Child Hlth, Populat Policy & Practice Res & Teaching Dept, London, England
[2] Univ Greenwich, Sch Human Sci, London, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Biomed Res Ctr, Natl Inst Hlth Res NIHR, London, England
[5] UCL Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[6] Ulverscroft Vis Res Grp, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 12期
关键词
FUNCTIONAL VISION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; MEASURES PROMS; YOUNG-PEOPLE; HEALTH-CARE; CHILDREN; FEEDBACK; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0243563
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives Routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess quality of health care systems is mandated in many countries and has been implemented successfully in many specialities. Ophthalmology currently lags behind. To support and inform future implementation, we investigated paediatric ophthalmic clinicians' experience of, and future training needs for, using child-appropriate vision PROMs and their views about the barriers and enablers to future routine implementation in clinical practice. Methods We conducted a pilot study, using an online survey to elicit the experience, attitudes, training needs and perceptions of barriers and enablers to routine PROMs use of ophthalmic health professionals in the Paediatric Ophthalmology Department at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London. A focus-group was undertaken to discuss survey results and preferences regarding presentation of PROM data. Analysis comprised descriptive statistics, presented alongside complementary qualitative data. Results Eighteen clinicians in the department completed the survey. Twenty-seven took part in the focus group. Clinicians had limited experience of using PROMs but high confidence in the potential positive impact on communication with patients, monitoring chronic conditions and clinical decision-making. Clinicians identified operational issues (collection and analysis of data) and impact (interpretation and application of data) as the two key areas for consideration. Training and information requirements before implementation were clearly articulated, alongside the benefits of using digital/electronic data capture ahead of consultations to allow efficiency and automated analysis, and presentation in an appropriate visual format alongside clinical data to ensure meaningful use. Conclusion The findings of this pilot study of ophthalmic clinicians working in a specialist paediatric ophthalmology department, suggest that ophthalmic clinicians recognise the potential benefits of routine PROMs use in clinical practice. Together with existing literature outside ophthalmology relating to overcoming barriers and exploiting enablers to routine implementation, findings may be applicable in planning routine PROM implementation in paediatric ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice
    Santana, Maria J.
    Haverman, Lotte
    Absolom, Kate
    Takeuchi, Elena
    Feeny, David
    Grootenhuis, Martha
    Velikova, Galina
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (07) : 1707 - 1718
  • [2] Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice
    Maria J. Santana
    Lotte Haverman
    Kate Absolom
    Elena Takeuchi
    David Feeny
    Martha Grootenhuis
    Galina Velikova
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1707 - 1718
  • [3] Training lung transplant specialists to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice
    Santana, Maria Jose
    Feeny, David
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 : 3 - 4
  • [4] The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice and Clinical Decision Making
    Makhni, Eric C.
    Hennekes, Mary E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (20) : 1059 - 1066
  • [5] Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review
    Marshall, Susan
    Haywood, Kirstie
    Fitzpatrick, Ray
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 12 (05) : 559 - 568
  • [6] Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice
    Kroenke, Kurt
    Monahan, Patrick O.
    Kean, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (09) : 1085 - 1092
  • [7] An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures in ophthalmic research
    Denniston, A. K.
    Kyte, D.
    Calvert, M.
    Burr, J. M.
    EYE, 2014, 28 (06) : 637 - 645
  • [8] An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures in ophthalmic research
    A K Denniston
    D Kyte
    M Calvert
    J M Burr
    Eye, 2014, 28 : 637 - 645
  • [9] „Patient-reported outcome measures“Reif für die Routine?Patient-reported outcome measuresReady for the routine?
    Christoph Kowalski
    Jutta Hübner
    Forum, 2020, 35 (5) : 401 - 405
  • [10] Choosing and Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice
    Kroenke, Kurt
    Miksch, Timothy A.
    Spaulding, Aaron C.
    Mazza, Gina L.
    DeStephano, Christopher C.
    Niazi, Shehzad K.
    Illies, Allie J. Canoy
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Novotny, Paull
    Goyal, Anshit
    Lee, Minji K.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 103 (05): : S108 - S117