An economic analysis of trial of labor after cesarean delivery

被引:2
|
作者
Friedman, Alexander M. [1 ]
Ananth, Cande V. [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ling [1 ]
D'Alton, Mary E. [1 ]
Wright, Jason D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Fetal Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Joseph L Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
来源
关键词
Cesarean; cost; obstetric quality; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; TREATMENT FAILURE; VAGINAL BIRTH; CHARGES;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2015.1035250
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Given that cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the United States and an important contributor to obstetric care costs, this analysis sought to examine maternal hospital costs associated with trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) versus repeat cesarean delivery (RCD).Methods: A national sample was used to identify women with singleton pregnancy who underwent either TOLAC or RCD from 2006 to 2012. Women with diagnoses that could confound cost via extended hospital length of stay prior to delivery were excluded. Other medical and obstetric covariates that could influence cost were included in an adjusted model.Results: A total of 485247 women were identified, including 365596 (75.3%) cesarean deliveries without labor, 41988 (8.6%) successful and 77663 (16.0%) unsuccessful TOLAC deliveries. The inflation-adjusted median costs in this cohort were $5512 for cesarean without labor, $4175 for successful TOLAC, $5166 for all TOLAC attempts, and $5759 for failed TOLAC. In a multivariable model, hospital region was a major predictor of median cost as were demographic variables and medical comorbidities.Conclusion: TOLAC is associated with modest reductions of cost for maternal hospitalizations. However, other medical, demographic and hospital factors appear to be more important factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1030 / 1035
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dinoprostone and Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery
    Leftwich, Heidi K.
    Peterson, Jessica
    Hibbard, Judith U.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 64S - 65S
  • [2] Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in Ireland
    Lutomski, Jennifer
    Greene, Richard
    Meaney, Sarah
    Forgeard, Natalie
    Devane, Declan
    Daly, Deirdre
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S341 - S342
  • [3] Progress of induced labor in trial of labor after cesarean delivery
    Sondgeroth, Kristina E.
    Stout, Molly J.
    Graseck, Anna S.
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Macones, George A.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (03)
  • [4] Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis
    Kok, N.
    Ruiter, L.
    Lindeboom, R.
    de Groot, C.
    Pajkrt, E.
    Mol, B. W.
    Kazemier, B. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 195 : 214 - 218
  • [5] OUTCOME OF A TRIAL OF LABOR AFTER PRIOR CESAREAN DELIVERY
    EGLINTON, GS
    PHELAN, JP
    YEH, S
    DIAZ, FP
    WALLACE, TM
    PAUL, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1984, 29 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [6] Outcomes of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery
    Brubaker, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (05) : 1104 - 1105
  • [7] SHOULDER PAIN IN A TRIAL OF LABOR AFTER CESAREAN DELIVERY
    SHIN, YK
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 82 (10) : 1320 - 1321
  • [8] Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: The making of a recommendation
    Wall, E
    Roberts, R
    Deutchman, M
    Hueston, WH
    Atwood, LA
    Ireland, B
    [J]. AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2005, 72 (10) : 1980 - +
  • [9] Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the impact of BMI
    Ruhstaller, Kelly
    Hoffman, Matthew K.
    Sciscione, Anthony
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S295 - S296
  • [10] Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: The effect of previous vaginal delivery
    Caughey, AA
    Shipp, TD
    Repke, JT
    Zelop, C
    Cohen, A
    Lieherman, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (04) : 938 - 941