Robot-Assisted Technique for Boari Flap Ureteral Reimplantation: Is Robot Assistance Beneficial?

被引:26
|
作者
Minh Do [1 ]
Kallidonis, Panagiotis [1 ,2 ]
Qazi, Hasan [3 ]
Liatsikos, Evangelos [2 ]
Phuc Ho Thi [1 ]
Dietel, Anja [1 ]
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Dept Urol, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Patras, Dept Urol, Patras 26504, Greece
[3] Gartnavel Royal Hosp, Dept Urol, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
SINGLE-INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; PSOAS HITCH; LEARNING-CURVE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2013.0775
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Ureteral reconstructive surgery necessitates adequate exposure of the ureteral lesion and results in large abdominal incisions. Robot assistance allows the performance of complex ureteral reconstructive surgery through small incisions. The current series includes only cases of Boari flaps performed by robot assistance and attempts to describe in detail the technique, review the literature, as well as to expand the experience in the current literature. Patients and Methods: Eight patients underwent ureteral reimplantation by Boari flap technique. The indications for the performance of the procedure included ureteral stricture from iatrogenic injury in three patients, recurrent ureteral stricture after multiple endoscopic stone management procedures in one patient, ureteral stricture from previous malignant disease in the pelvis or abdomen in three patients, and ureteral stricture due to trauma in one patient. Five cases were located in the left side and three cases in the right side. A variety of parameters were recorded in a prospective database including the time for robot docking and total operative time as well as catheterization and drainage time. The follow-up of the patients included the performance of renal ultrasonography 4 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Results: Mean age of the patients was 50.8 (range 39-62) years and mean body mass index was 26.2 (range 23.22-29.29) kg/m(2). Operative time ranged 115 and 240 (mean 171.9) minutes. Mean blood loss was 161.3 (50-250) mL. Conversion to open surgery did not take place in the current series. No intraoperative complications were observed. Postoperative complications included one case of prolonged anastomotic leakage. Conclusion: The robot-assisted approach is efficient in the performance of ureteral reimplantation with Boari flap. Low blood loss, short catheterization time, low complication rate, and excellent reconstructive outcome are associated with the approach. Robot assistance seems to be beneficial for ureteral reconstructive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 685
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Boari Flap Ureteral Reimplantation
    Schimpf, Megan O.
    Wagner, Joseph R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (12) : 2691 - 2694
  • [2] ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC BOARI FLAP & URETERAL REIMPLANTATION
    Wagner, Joseph R.
    Schimpf, Megan O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 553 - 553
  • [3] ROBOT ASSISTED URETERAL REIMPLANTATION SIDE-TO-SIDE WITH BOARI FLAP
    Bakayoko, Abdel
    El Akri, Mehdi
    Freton, Lucas
    Hascoet, Juliette
    Khene, Zinne-Eddine
    Grafeille, Vivien
    Verhoest, Gregory
    Manunta, Andrea
    Romain, Mathieu
    Bensalah, Karim
    Zhao, Lee
    Peyronnet, Benoit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E55 - E55
  • [4] Robot-assisted technique for Boari flap ureteric reimplantation: replicating the techniques of open surgery in robotics
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Rai, Bhavan P.
    Do, Minh
    Dietel, Anja
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Ganzer, Roman
    Qazi, Hasan
    Meneses, Aurus Dourado
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (03) : 482 - 484
  • [5] Robot-assisted ureterectomy with Boari flap reconstruction for distal ureteral stenosis
    Pili, A.
    Bonutto, A.
    Marzocco, A.
    Peschiera, F.
    Olivera, L.
    Viola, L.
    Livio, V
    Salamone, V
    Mazzola, L.
    Lo Re, M.
    Vignolini, G.
    Gacci, M.
    Minervini, A.
    Serni, S.
    Masieri, L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S2014 - S2014
  • [6] Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: Points of technique
    Kyle, Chris C.
    Carey, Robert I.
    Leveillee, Raymond J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A356 - A356
  • [7] Robot-assisted laparoscopic diverticulectomy with ureteral reimplantation
    Koehne, Elizabeth
    Desai, Shalin
    Lindgren, Bruce
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2020, 16 (04) : 508 - 509
  • [8] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC URETERAL REIMPLANTATION: THE VIDEO
    Orvieto, Marcelo
    Jayram, Gautam
    Gundeti, Mohan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E689 - E690
  • [9] A Modified Transurethral Stenting Technique for (Robot-Assisted) Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation
    Teng, Jingfei
    Jia, Zhuomin
    Ai, Xing
    Guan, Yawei
    Gao, Feng
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 102 (04) : 385 - 389
  • [10] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC EXTRAVESICAL BILATERAL URETERAL REIMPLANTATION: LUAA TECHNIQUE
    Hajiyev, Parviz
    Fialkoff, Jared
    Gundeti, Mohan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E339 - E339