Assessment of Social Cognition and Theory of Mind: Initial Validation of the Geneva Social Cognition Scale

被引:11
|
作者
Martory, Marie-Dominique [1 ,2 ]
Pegna, Alan John [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sheybani, Laurent [4 ]
Metral, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Pertusio, Francoise Bernasconi [1 ,2 ]
Annoni, Jean-Marie [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Neurol, Neuropsychol Unit, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Neurol, Lab Expt Neuropsychol, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Univ Med Ctr CMU, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Dept Neurosci, Univ Med Ctr CMU, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Univ & Hosp Fribourg, Dept Med, Fac Sci, Neurol Unit, Fribourg, Switzerland
关键词
Clinical scale; Neuropsychological evaluation; Brain damage; Social emotions; False beliefs; Inferences; Absurdity judgement; Executive planning; ASPERGER-SYNDROME; BRAIN-INJURY; IMPAIRMENTS; DEFICITS; AUTISM; ADULTS; EYES;
D O I
10.1159/000442412
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Social cognition is widely studied in neurology. At present, such evaluations are designed for research or for specific diseases and simple general clinical tools are lacking. We propose a clinical evaluation tool for social cognition, the Geneva Social Cognition Scale (GeSoCS). Methods: The GeSoCS is a 100-point scale composed of 6 subtests (theory of mind stories, recognition of social emotions, false beliefs, inferences, absurdity judgement and planning abilities) chosen from different validated tests of social and cognitive evaluation. Eighty-four patients with neurological disorders and 52 controls participated in the study. Evaluation duration lasted 20-60 min. Results: Mean scores were 92.6 +/- 4.5 for controls and 76.5 +/- 15.3 for patients and differentiate patients and controls in all subtests. With a cut-off score of 84, the scale had a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 94%. In our stroke subgroup, right CVAs failed in cartoons, inferences, 'mind in the eyes', and in the temporal rule task while left CVAs were impaired in verbal/discourse tasks (social cognition, inferences, absurd stories, and cartoons. Conclusions: The GeSoCS is a medium duration assessment tool that appears to detect and characterize significant social impairment in neurological patients. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 295
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social cognition in adolescence: Social rejection and theory of mind
    Sebastian, Catherine L.
    [J]. PSICOLOGIA EDUCATIVA, 2015, 21 (02): : 125 - 131
  • [2] Embodied Social Cognition and Embedded Theory of Mind
    Fenici, Marco
    [J]. BIOLINGUISTICS, 2012, 6 (3-4): : 276 - 307
  • [3] Training social cognition: From imitation to Theory of Mind
    Santiesteban, Idalmis
    White, Sarah
    Cook, Jennifer
    Gilbert, Sam J.
    Heyes, Cecilia
    Bird, Geoffrey
    [J]. COGNITION, 2012, 122 (02) : 228 - 235
  • [4] NATURALISTIC SOCIAL COGNITION - METHODOLOGY, ASSESSMENT, AND VALIDATION
    ICKES, W
    ROBERTSON, E
    TOOKE, W
    TENG, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (01) : 66 - 82
  • [5] Social cognition, language acquisition and the development of the theory of mind
    Garfield, JL
    Peterson, CC
    Perry, T
    [J]. MIND & LANGUAGE, 2001, 16 (05) : 494 - 541
  • [6] NEUROPATHWAYS OF SOCIAL COGNITION IN RELATION TO THEORY OF MIND IN SCHIZOPHRENIA
    Weng, Yiting
    Tsang, Hector W. H.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2019, 45 : S274 - S274
  • [7] Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind
    Krawczak, Karolina
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2011, 3 (02) : 336 - 343
  • [8] Assessing theory of mind and social norms understanding in Indian children: adaptation and validation of Edinburgh social cognition test
    Bhutani, Saniya
    Singh, Kamlesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC MENTAL HEALTH, 2024, 23 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [10] Social cognition in ADHD: Irony understanding and recursive theory of mind
    Caillies, Stephanie
    Bertot, Vincine
    Motte, Jacques
    Raynaud, Christine
    Abely, Michel
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 35 (11) : 3191 - 3198