Effects of Photoperiod on the Development of Forensically Important Blow Fly Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae)

被引:12
|
作者
Bauer, Amely M. [1 ,2 ]
Bauer, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Tomberlin, Jeffery K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Entomol, 2475 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ Goettingen, Dept Anim Evolut & Biodivers, Untere Karspuele 2, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
light duration; postmortem; time of colonization; COCHLIOMYIA-MACELLARIA DIPTERA; LUCILIA-SERICATA DIPTERA; PHORMIA-REGINA DIPTERA; FLIES DIPTERA; POSTMORTEM INTERVAL; FABRICIUS DIPTERA; LARVAL DIAPAUSE; TISSUE-TYPE; TEMPERATURE; MACQUART;
D O I
10.1093/jme/tjaa058
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Estimation of the time of colonization (TOC) is often based on laboratory studies that document arthropod development. Precise data for forensically important species, such as blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae), are essential for accuracy in the estimate of TOC. Calliphorid development is a quantitative trait and thus depends on a host of variables. In calliphorids, studies showed photoperiod can play a role in development. However, there has been little research to date on the effects of photoperiod, and available data indicate the impact is species-specific. In this study, the effects of photoperiod on the development of Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart), were examined. Chrysomya rufifacies is a fly of great medical and legal importance and is often encountered on vertebrate remains in temperate and tropic regions throughout the world, including North and Central America, Asia, and Australia. Larvae were reared under light regimes of 12, 16, and 24 h of light at 28.5 +/- 0.0 degrees C, 86.2 +/- 0.3 RH. Minimum development time for each stage did not differ significantly for the applied photoperiods, nor were there significant differences in total minimum postembryonic development time. Photoperiod did not significantly affect larval size or growth rate. The data suggest that light durations investigated in this study do not influence the development of C. rufifacies. This indicates that photoperiod may not be a concern for forensic entomologists in Texas, United States, or other areas with similar conditions when estimating theTOC for this species. Validation efforts are encouraged to verify this conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:1382 / 1389
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life table of forensically important blow fly, Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) ( Diptera: Calliphoridae)
    Hadura, A. H.
    Sundharavalli, R.
    Azulia, Noor Z. A.
    Zairi, J.
    Hamdan, A.
    [J]. TROPICAL BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 35 (02) : 413 - 422
  • [2] Competition Among Three Forensically Important Blow Fly Species (Diptera: Calliphoridae): Phormia regina, Lucilia sericata, and Chrysomya rufifacies
    MacInnis, Amber E.
    Higley, Leon G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2020, 49 (06) : 1473 - 1479
  • [3] Effects of temperature variation on the life cycle of the forensically important Calliphoridae fly Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart 1843) (Diptera)
    Bansode, Sarika
    More, Vitthal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TROPICAL INSECT SCIENCE, 2024, 44 (02) : 747 - 757
  • [4] Effects of Temperatures on Development of a Forensically Important Fly Chrysomya villeneuvi Patton (Diptera: Calliphoridae)
    Salleh, Ahmad Firdaus Mohd.
    Marwi, Mohamed Abdullah
    Abdullah, Syamsa Rizal
    Azil, Aishah Hani
    Omar, Baharudin
    [J]. SAINS MALAYSIANA, 2014, 43 (10): : 1537 - 1542
  • [5] Morphological comparison between Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) and Chrysomya villeneuvi Patton (Diptera: Calliphoridae) puparia, forensically important blow flies
    Sukontason, Kabkaew L.
    Narongchai, Paitoon
    Kanchai, Chaturong
    Vichairat, Karnda
    Piangjai, Somsak
    Boonsriwong, Worachote
    Bunchu, Nophawan
    Sripakdee, Duanghatai
    Chaiwong, Tarinee
    Kuntalue, Budsabong
    Siriwattanarungsee, Sirisuda
    Sukontason, Kom
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 164 (2-3) : 230 - 234
  • [6] Laboratory Colonization of the Blow Flies, Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae) and Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae)
    Swiger, Sonja Lise
    Hogsette, Jerome A.
    Butler, Jerry F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2014, 107 (05) : 1780 - 1784
  • [7] Development of two forensically important blowfly species (Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya rufifacies) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) at four temperatures in India
    Bala, Madhu
    Singh, Devinder
    [J]. ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 45 (04) : 176 - 183
  • [8] Impact of aluminum phosphide on development of the forensically important fly, Chrysomya albiceps (Diptera: Calliphoridae)
    Tony, Mahran
    Zahra, Abdullah
    Abdellah, Nora Zeidan
    Abdelreheem, Abdelbaset Mohamed Ahmed
    Abdel-Samad, Mohammad Reda Kamel
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PARASITOLOGIA VETERINARIA, 2024, 33 (01):
  • [9] Effects of temperature on Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) development
    Byrd, JH
    Butler, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1997, 34 (03) : 353 - 358
  • [10] Oviposition Preferences of Two Forensically Important Blow Fly Species, Chrysomya megacephala and C. rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae), and Implications for Postmortem Interval Estimation
    Yang, Shih-Tsai
    Shiao, Shiuh-Feng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2012, 49 (02) : 424 - 435