Standards and Best Practices for Monitoring and Benchmarking Insects

被引:114
|
作者
Montgomery, Graham A. [1 ]
Belitz, Michael W. [2 ,3 ]
Guralnick, Rob P. [2 ]
Tingley, Morgan W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Florida Museum Nat Hist, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Biol, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
survey; methodology; metadata; entomology; insect decline; COLORED PAN TRAPS; PITFALL TRAPS; MALAISE TRAPS; CAPTURE EFFICIENCY; HYMENOPTERA; ABUNDANCE; DECLINES; MOTHS; BEES; COLEOPTERA;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2020.579193
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Benchmark studies of insect populations are increasingly relevant and needed amid accelerating concern about insect trends in the Anthropocene. The growing recognition that insect populations may be in decline has given rise to a renewed call for insect population monitoring by scientists, and a desire from the broader public to participate in insect surveys. However, due to the immense diversity of insects and a vast assortment of data collection methods, there is a general lack of standardization in insect monitoring methods, such that a sudden and unplanned expansion of data collection may fail to meet its ecological potential or conservation needs without a coordinated focus on standards and best practices. To begin to address this problem, we provide simple guidelines for maximizing return on proven inventory methods that will provide insect benchmarking data suitable for a variety of ecological responses, including occurrence and distribution, phenology, abundance and biomass, and diversity and species composition. To track these responses, we present seven primary insect sampling methods-malaise trapping, light trapping, pan trapping, pitfall trappings, beating sheets, acoustic monitoring, and active visual surveys-and recommend standards while highlighting examples of model programs. For each method, we discuss key topics such as recommended spatial and temporal scales of sampling, important metadata to track, and degree of replication needed to produce rigorous estimates of ecological responses. We additionally suggest protocols for scalable insect monitoring, from backyards to national parks. Overall, we aim to compile a resource that can be used by diverse individuals and organizations seeking to initiate or improve insect monitoring programs in this era of rapid change.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental monitoring - A framework for benchmarking best practices
    Hanlon, DWG
    McGuire, PJ
    Carney, DJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF SUGAR CANE TECHNOLOGISTS, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 183 - 186
  • [2] Benchmarking and best practices
    Hill, C
    [J]. ASQ'S 54TH ANNUAL QUALITY CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 715 - 717
  • [3] BENCHMARKING BEST PRACTICES
    BROWN, DH
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1994, 13 (07): : 86 - 86
  • [4] Benchmarking & best practices implementation
    DePalma, A
    [J]. GENETIC ENGINEERING NEWS, 2005, 25 (21): : 52 - 53
  • [5] Challenges and best practices in omics benchmarking
    Brooks, Thomas G.
    Lahens, Nicholas F.
    Mrcela, Antonijo
    Grant, Gregory R.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2024, 25 (05) : 326 - 339
  • [6] A typology of "best practices" for a benchmarking process
    Maire, Jean-Luc
    Bronet, Vincent
    Pillet, Maurice
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2005, 12 (01) : 45 - +
  • [7] Benchmarking for best practices in the public sector
    Eimicke, WB
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1998, 28 (01): : 90 - 95
  • [8] Challenges and best practices in omics benchmarking
    Thomas G. Brooks
    Nicholas F. Lahens
    Antonijo Mrčela
    Gregory R. Grant
    [J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2024, 25 : 326 - 339
  • [9] Benchmarking best NPD practices - III
    Cooper, RG
    Edgett, SJ
    Kleinschmidt, EJ
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2004, 47 (06) : 43 - 55
  • [10] DISCOVER BEST PRACTICES THROUGH BENCHMARKING
    GREENGARD, S
    [J]. PERSONNEL JOURNAL, 1995, 74 (11) : 62 - &