Sensitivity of olive leaf turgor to air vapour pressure deficit correlates with diurnal maximum stomatal conductance

被引:23
|
作者
Rodriguez-Dominguez, C. M. [1 ,3 ]
Hernandez-Santana, V. [1 ]
Buckley, T. N. [2 ]
Fernandez, J. E. [1 ]
Diaz-Espejo, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, IRNAS, Irrigat & Crop Ecophysiol Grp, Ave Reina Mercedes 10, Seville 41012, Spain
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Tasmania, Sch Biol Sci, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 美国国家科学基金会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Plant water stress indicator; Leaf turgor pressure; Stomatal conductance; Olive; Drought; Moderate water stress; SAP FLOW MEASUREMENTS; TREE WATER STATUS; TRUNK DIAMETER; HEAT-PULSE; GAS-EXCHANGE; C-3; PLANTS; IRRIGATION; STRESS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PROBE;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.04.006
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Effective study and management of crops and forests would benefit greatly from useful plant-based indicators of the biological controls on evapotranspiration, and particularly stomatal conductance (g(s)). Given the strong influence of g(s) on bulk leaf water potential and turgor pressure (P), in vivo measurement of P may provide useful information about diurnal or seasonal dynamics of g(s). Moderate plant water stress affects the diurnal dynamics of P as leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit (D) varies, and these dynamics correlate to g(s). Here, we explored relative changes in P in response to changes in D under mild drought conditions, and how these changes are linked to stomatal behaviour, and specifically to diurnal maximum g(s) (g(s,max)), one of the best indicators of plant water stress. We monitored ecophysiological and environmental variables, as well as a relative proxy for P, during three consecutive seasons in a hedgerow olive orchard where trees were supplied with different irrigation treatments to create well-watered and moderately water-stressed conditions. Our results demonstrated that the sensitivity of P to D correlated well with g(s,max) reached by the trees within a range in which variations in g(s) are the main diffusional limitation to photosynthesis. We further showed that this correlation held under a wide range of meteorological conditions and soil water availability. This turgor proxy measurement, which is much easier to measure than g(s), can facilitate the use of g(s,max) as an indicator of plant water stress and evapotranspiration in agriculture and plant science research.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 165
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stomatal responses to leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit in sahelian species
    Maroco, JP
    Pereira, JS
    Chaves, MM
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 24 (03): : 381 - 387
  • [2] Height-related trends in stomatal sensitivity to leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit in a tall conifer
    Woodruff, D. R.
    Meinzer, F. C.
    McCulloh, K. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2010, 61 (01) : 203 - 210
  • [3] Genetic effects on transpiration, canopy conductance, stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit, and cavitation resistance in loblolly pine
    Aspinwall, Michael J.
    King, John S.
    Domec, Jean-Christophe
    McKeand, Steven E.
    Isik, Fikret
    [J]. ECOHYDROLOGY, 2011, 4 (02) : 168 - 182
  • [4] Decoupling the influence of leaf and root hydraulic conductances on stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit as soil dries in a drained loblolly pine plantation
    Domec, Jean-Christophe
    Noormets, Asko
    King, John S.
    Sun, Ge
    McNulty, Steven G.
    Gavazzi, Michael J.
    Boggs, Johnny L.
    Treasure, Emrys A.
    [J]. PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 32 (08): : 980 - 991
  • [5] Leaf Temperature and Vapour Pressure Deficit (VPD) Driving Stomatal Conductance and Biochemical Processes of Leaf Photosynthetic Rate in a Subtropical Evergreen Coniferous Plantation
    Li, Yue
    Zhou, Lei
    Wang, Shaoqiang
    Chi, Yonggang
    Chen, Jinghua
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [6] Stomatal responses to changes in vapour pressure difference between leaf and air
    Yong, JWH
    Wong, SC
    Farquhar, GD
    [J]. PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 20 (10): : 1213 - 1216
  • [7] Apparent surface conductance sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit in the absence of plants
    Lucas R. Vargas Zeppetello
    Kaighin A. McColl
    Jeremiah A. Bernau
    Brenda B. Bowen
    Lois I. Tang
    N. Michele Holbrook
    Pierre Gentine
    Peter Huybers
    [J]. Nature Water, 2023, 1 (11): : 941 - 951
  • [8] Stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit relates to climate of origin in Eucalyptus species
    Bourne, Aimee E.
    Haigh, Anthony M.
    Ellsworth, David S.
    [J]. TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 35 (03) : 266 - 278
  • [9] Temporal variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit in western riparian forests
    Guo, Jessica S.
    Bush, Susan E.
    Hultine, Kevin R.
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 36 (07) : 1599 - 1611
  • [10] Comparing model predictions and experimental data for the response of stomatal conductance and guard cell turgor to manipulations of cuticular conductance, leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference and temperature: feedback mechanisms are able to account for all observations
    Eamus, Derek
    Taylor, Daniel T.
    Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O.
    Shanahan, Steve
    De Silva, Lionel
    [J]. PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 31 (03): : 269 - 277