Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes in implant-supported overdentures retained by milled bars: Two-year follow-up

被引:14
|
作者
Toia, Marco [1 ]
Wennerberg, Ann [2 ]
Torrisi, Paolo [3 ]
Farina, Vittorio [3 ]
Corra, Enrico [3 ]
Cecchinato, Denis [3 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Oral Med, Fac Odontol, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Prosthodont, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Inst Franci, Padua, Italy
关键词
CAD-CAM; edentulous arch; implant; OHIP-14; overdenture; quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RESIDUAL RIDGE RESORPTION; ORAL-HEALTH; MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; MAXILLARY OVERDENTURES; CONVENTIONAL DENTURES; TOOTH LOSS; IMPACT; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/joor.12784
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This observational clinical study evaluated the patient satisfaction and the clinical outcomes of edentulous arches rehabilitated with overdentures retained by CAD-CAM milled titanium bars. Materials and Methods Edentulous patients were treated with a full-arch removable overdenture anchored on two milled bars based on a friction retention system. Patient satisfaction was tested using the validated Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire at the pre- and post-treatment visits, up to two years after prosthesis delivery (possible score range: 0-56. Best: 0). The prosthodontist satisfaction was also assessed through a designed questionnaire (best possible range 0-4. Best:0). Radiographic and clinical examinations were performed at baseline and after 2 years of function. Implant and prostheses complications were recorded. Results Forty (25 mandible) edentulous patients, mean age 69 +/- 9.5 (SD) (52% males, 10% smokers), were treated with a total of 185 implants. The mean difference between pre- and post-treatment OHIP-14 score was 20.6 +/- 8.0 (P < 0.0001) showing a high level of satisfaction for aesthetics, functional and psychological outcomes. This perception was not influenced by patient's age or gender. The clinicians' mean score was 3.4 +/- 4.0. There was a marginal bone level (MBL) gain of 0.02 +/- 0.22 mm between the two time points. Minor complications were reported in five patients. Conclusions This procedure may lead to satisfaction regarding aesthetics and mastication function. One of the most relevant aspects is the versatility, which allows selection of the most suitable treatment option according to patient needs. The prosthodontist satisfaction questionnaire showed that this procedure met the clinical expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 633
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediately Loaded, Implant-Supported Overdentures Retained by a Milled Bar: An Up-to-5-Year Retrospective Clinical Study
    Villa, Franco
    Grassi, Felice Roberto
    Popovic, Maja
    Sordillo, Raffaele
    Kalemaj, Zamira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 37 (05) : E261 - E269
  • [2] Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar:: A retrospective study
    Krennmair, Gerald
    Krainhoefner, Martin
    Piehslinger, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2007, 22 (06) : 987 - 994
  • [3] Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study
    Krennmair, Gerald
    Suetoe, Daniel
    Seemann, Rudolf
    Piehslinger, Eva
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (04) : 481 - 488
  • [4] Rehabilitation of a maxillary partial edentulous patient using an implant-supported overdenture retained with two bilateral milled bars
    Almadani, Atif Mohammed
    Huettig, Fabian
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2020, 13 (08)
  • [5] Patient Preference and Satisfaction with Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures Retained with Ball or Locator Attachments: A Crossover Clinical Trial
    Krennmair, Gerald
    Seemann, Rudolf
    Fazekas, Andres
    Ewers, Rolf
    Piehslinger, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2012, 27 (06) : 1560 - 1568
  • [6] A custom screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis for a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta: An 8-year clinical follow-up
    Bernal, Guillermo
    Salazar, Carolina
    Sadowsky, Steven J.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 127 (04): : 533 - 537
  • [7] Two-Year Prospective Follow-up of Implant/Tooth-Supported Versus Freestanding Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures
    Akca, Kivanc
    Cehreli, Murat C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2008, 28 (06) : 593 - 599
  • [8] Implant-Supported Maxillary Overdentures Retained with Milled Bars: Maxillary Anterior Versus Maxillary Posterior Concept - A Retrospective Study
    Krennmair, Gerald
    Krainhoefner, Martin
    Piehslinger, Eva
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2008, 16 (03): : 287 - 298
  • [9] Implant-supported maxillary overdentures retained with milled bars:: Maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept -: A retrospective study
    Krennmair, Gerald
    Krainhoefner, Martin
    Piehslinger, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2008, 23 (02) : 343 - 352
  • [10] Mandibular implant-supported overdentures in (frail) elderly: A prospective study with 20-year follow-up
    Bakker, Mieke H.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Visser, Anita
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (04) : 586 - 592