Vein Grafting in Microsurgical Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcome Analysis of Primary versus Secondary Salvage Procedures

被引:4
|
作者
Gazyakan, Emre [1 ]
Xiong, Lingyun [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Jiaming [2 ]
Kneser, Ulrich [1 ]
Hirche, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, BG Trauma Ctr Ludwigshafen, Dept Hand Plast & Reconstruct Surgf, Ludwig Guttmann Str 13, D-67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Plast Surg, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
vein graft; interposition vein grafting; free flap reconstruction; lower extremity reconstruction;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1723823
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Many microsurgeons fear high complication rates and free flap loss when vein grafting is necessary to restore blood flow at the recipient site. The aims of this study were to comparatively analyze surgical outcomes of interposition vein grafts (VG) in microsurgical primary lower extremity reconstruction and secondary salvage procedures. Patients and Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 58 patients undergoing free flap transfers with vein grafting for primary lower extremity reconstruction (cohort 1) and secondary salvage procedures (cohort 2) between 2002 and 2016. A matched-pair analysis of both cohorts and 58 non-VG flaps was performed. Patient data, preoperative conditions, flap and vein graft characteristics, postoperative outcomes such as flap failure, thrombosis, and wound complications were analyzed. Results A total of 726 free flap transfers were performed. In total, 36 primary reconstructions (5%) utilized 41 interposition VG (cohort 1). Postoperative vascular compromise was observed in 65 free flaps (9%). In total, 22 out of 65 secondary salvage procedures (33.8%) utilized 26 interposition VG (cohort 2). Two total flap losses occurred in each cohort (5.6 vs. 9.1%; p =0.63). Postoperative complications were observed in 38.9% of free flaps in cohort 1 and 72.7% in cohort 2 ( p =0.01). Takeback for microvascular compromise was comparable in both cohorts (19.4 vs. 22.7%; p =0.75). Microvascular complications occurred more often in cohort 2 (22.7%) than in cohort 1 (8.3%; p =0.28). Lower extremity salvage rates were high among both cohorts (94.4 vs. 90.9%; p =0.63). Matched-pair analysis did not show any relevant differences on takebacks and flap loss ( p =0.32 and p =1.0). Conclusion In complex lower extremity reconstructions, VG can be performed with acceptable complication rates and outcomes in primary and especially in salvage cases. With careful planning and a consistent surgical protocol, VG can provide reliable success rates in limb salvage.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 616
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MICROSURGICAL RECONSTRUCTION IN LIMB-SALVAGE PROCEDURES - COMPARISON BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY RECONSTRUCTION
    USUI, M
    ISHII, S
    NAITO, T
    YAMASHITA, M
    YAMAMURA, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 1993, 9 (02) : 91 - 101
  • [2] Mangled extremity: limb salvage for reconstruction versus primary amputation
    Tjardes, Thorsten
    Marche, Benedikt
    Imach, Sebastian
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 29 (06) : 682 - 688
  • [3] Pediatric lower extremity sarcoma reconstruction: A review of limb salvage procedures and outcomes
    Piper, Merisa
    Irwin, Chetan
    Sbitany, Hani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2016, 69 (01): : 91 - 96
  • [4] Free flaps for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in lower extremity: A meta-analysis on microsurgical outcome and safety
    Xiong, Lingyun
    Gazyakan, Emre
    Kremer, Thomas
    Hernekamp, Frederick J.
    Harhaus, Leila
    Saint-Cyr, Michel
    Kneser, Ulrich
    Hirche, Christoph
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 2016, 36 (06) : 511 - 524
  • [5] Factors Associated With Failed Hardware Salvage in High-Risk Patients After Microsurgical Lower Extremity Reconstruction
    Patel, Ketan M.
    Seruya, Mitchel
    Franklin, Brenton
    Attinger, Christopher E.
    Ducic, Ivica
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 69 (04) : 399 - 402
  • [6] Outcome analysis of lower extremity bypass grafting vs amputation surgery
    Burdi, MD
    Dalman, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 44 (01) : A90 - A90
  • [7] Technical modifications in endoscopic vein harvest techniques facilitate their use in lower extremity limb salvage procedures
    Jimenez, Juan Carlos
    Lawrence, Peter F.
    Rigberg, David A.
    Quinones-Baldrich, William J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 45 (03) : 549 - 553
  • [8] Comparison of reconstructive procedures in primary versus secondary mandibular reconstruction
    Andrade, William N.
    Lipa, Joan E.
    Novak, Christine B.
    Grover, Harpreet
    Bang, Christian
    Gilbert, Ralph W.
    Neligan, Peter C.
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2008, 30 (03): : 341 - 345
  • [9] Comparison of procedural outcomes after lower extremity reversed vein grafting and secondary surgical revision
    Landry, GJ
    Moneta, GL
    Taylor, LM
    Edwards, JM
    Yeager, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 38 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [10] Ablative versus limb salvage procedures in lower extremity bone tumors -: Ten years results
    Rödl, R
    Pohlmann, U
    Gosheger, G
    Hoffmann, C
    Leidinger, B
    Lindner, N
    Winkelmann, W
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2001, 139 (03): : 183 - 188