A new two-stage Stackelberg fuzzy data envelopment analysis model

被引:60
|
作者
Tavana, Madjid [1 ,2 ]
Khalili-Damghani, Kaveh [3 ]
机构
[1] La Salle Univ, Lindback Distinguished Chair Informat Syst & Deci, Business Syst & Analyt Dept, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[2] Univ Paderborn, Fac Business Adm & Econ, Business Informat Syst Dept, D-33098 Paderborn, Germany
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Ind Engn, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Two-stage DEA; Fuzzy set; Efficiency decomposition; Leader-follower; Stackelberg game; Banking; EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS; DEA MODELS; BANKING SECTOR; PERFORMANCE; SCALE; DECOMPOSITION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.030
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely used mathematical programming approach for evaluating the relative efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs). Conventional DEA methods treat DMUs as ''black boxes'', focusing entirely on their relative efficiencies. We propose an efficient two-stage fuzzy DEA model to calculate the efficiency scores for a DMU and its sub-DMUs. We use the Stackelberg (leader-follower) game theory approach to prioritize and sequentially decompose the efficiency score of the DMU into a set of efficiency scores for its sub-DMUs. The proposed models are linear and independent of the alpha-cut variables. The linear feature allows for a quick identification of the global optimum solution and the alpha-cut independency feature allows for a significant reduction in the computational efforts. Monte Carlo simulation is used to discriminately rank the efficiencies in the proposed method. We also present a case study to exhibit the efficacy of the procedures and to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method to a two-stage performance evaluation problem in the banking industry. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 296
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy efficiency ranking in fuzzy two-stage data envelopment analysis
    Liu, Shiang-Tai
    [J]. OPTIMIZATION LETTERS, 2014, 8 (02) : 633 - 652
  • [2] Fuzzy efficiency ranking in fuzzy two-stage data envelopment analysis
    Shiang-Tai Liu
    [J]. Optimization Letters, 2014, 8 : 633 - 652
  • [3] Double Frontier Two-Stage Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis
    Amirteimoori, Alireza
    Azizi, Hossein
    Kordrostami, Sohrab
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2020, 28 (01) : 117 - 152
  • [4] Development of a Bounded Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Model in the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment
    Mohammadi Ardakani, Shabnam
    Babaei Meybodi, Hamid
    Sayyadi Tooranloo, Hossein
    [J]. ADVANCES IN OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 2022
  • [5] Efficiency analysis in two-stage structures using fuzzy data envelopment analysis
    Hatami-Marbini, Adel
    Saati, Saber
    Sajadi, Seyed Mojtaba
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2018, 26 (04) : 909 - 932
  • [6] Efficiency analysis in two-stage structures using fuzzy data envelopment analysis
    Adel Hatami-Marbini
    Saber Saati
    Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi
    [J]. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2018, 26 : 909 - 932
  • [7] A COMPOSITIONAL APPROACH TO TWO-STAGE DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS IN INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ENVIRONMENT
    Javaherian, Nafiseh
    Hamzehee, Ali
    Tooranloo, Hossein Sayyadi
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND DECISIONS, 2021, 31 (01) : 21 - 39
  • [8] Supply Chain Performance Evaluation With Rough Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Model: Noncooperative Stackelberg Game Approach
    Shafiee, Morteza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 17 (04)
  • [9] Two-stage data envelopment analysis: An enhanced Russell measure model
    Ashrafi, A.
    Jaafar, A. B.
    Lee, L. S.
    [J]. BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS RESEARCH, 2011, 1 : 34 - 38
  • [10] A new parallel fuzzy data envelopment analysis model for parallel systems with two components based on Stackelberg game theory
    Shi, Xiao
    Emrouznejad, Ali
    Jin, Minyue
    Yang, Feng
    [J]. FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 19 (03) : 311 - 332