Climate as situational strength: Safety climate strength as a cross-level moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and safety behaviour

被引:37
|
作者
Lee, Sunhee [1 ]
Dalal, Reeshad S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Psychol, Taejon, South Korea
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept Psychol, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
Organizational climate; climate strength; situational strength; conscientiousness; safety; OF-FIT INDEXES; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; GROUP CONSENSUS; PERFORMANCE; PERSONALITY; MOTIVATION; MODEL; ANTECEDENTS; QUALITY; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1080/1359432X.2014.987231
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Extant research on climate strength has frequently invoked situational strength in passing. Given this, it is surprising that the fundamental prediction from the situational strength literaturenamely, that strong situations attenuate personality-behaviour relationshipshas thus far never been tested empirically using climate strength as an operationalization of situational strength. Consequently, in the present study, we tested this fundamental prediction by positing that organizational safety climate strength moderates the relationships between employee conscientiousness and two forms of employee safety behaviour, such that those relationships are attenuated in strong climates. Using a multilevel design consisting of 964 Korean employees nested within 17 manufacturing organizations, we found support for these cross-level interaction hypotheses. These findings legitimize the frequent invocation of situational strength by climate strength researchers, contribute to the theoretical foundation underlying climate strength, and yield important implications for future research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 132
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Team Conscientiousness, Team Safety Climate, and Individual Safety Performance: a Cross-Level Mediation Model
    Xu, Xiaohong
    Le, Nhan
    He, Yimin
    Yao, Xiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 35 (04) : 503 - 517
  • [2] Team Conscientiousness, Team Safety Climate, and Individual Safety Performance: a Cross-Level Mediation Model
    Xiaohong Xu
    Nhan Le
    Yimin He
    Xiang Yao
    [J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2020, 35 : 503 - 517
  • [3] Safety climate cross-validation, strength and prediction of safety behaviour
    Pousette, A.
    Larsson, S.
    Torner, M.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (03) : 398 - 404
  • [4] A qualitative cross-level investigation of safety climate perceptions
    Colley, S
    Neal, A
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 57 : 108 - 109
  • [5] The influence of psychosocial safety climate on miners' safety behavior: A cross-level research
    Yu, Min
    Qin, Wenjing
    Li, Jizu
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 150
  • [6] Safety climate, safety climate strength, and length of stay in the NICU
    Tawfik, Daniel S.
    Thomas, Eric J.
    Vogus, Timothy J.
    Liu, Jessica B.
    Sharek, Paul J.
    Nisbet, Courtney C.
    Lee, Henry C.
    Sexton, J. Bryan
    Profit, Jochen
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [7] Safety climate, safety climate strength, and length of stay in the NICU
    Daniel S. Tawfik
    Eric J. Thomas
    Timothy J. Vogus
    Jessica B. Liu
    Paul J. Sharek
    Courtney C. Nisbet
    Henry C. Lee
    J. Bryan Sexton
    Jochen Profit
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [8] A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates
    Zohar, D
    Luria, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (04) : 616 - 628
  • [9] Should We Agree to Disagree? The Multilevel Moderated Relationship Between Safety Climate Strength And Individual Safety Motivation
    Huw Flatau-Harrison
    Mark A. Griffin
    Marylene Gagne
    [J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2021, 36 : 679 - 691
  • [10] Should We Agree to Disagree? The Multilevel Moderated Relationship Between Safety Climate Strength And Individual Safety Motivation
    Flatau-Harrison, Huw
    Griffin, Mark A.
    Gagne, Marylene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 36 (04) : 679 - 691