THE ANTITRUST OF REPUTATION MECHANISMS: INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS AND CONCERTED REFUSALS TO DEAL

被引：0

|

作者：

Richman, Barak D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Duke Univ, Sch Law, Durham, NC 27706 USA

来源：

VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW | 2009年 / 95卷 / 02期

关键词：

COOPERATION; ADVANTAGE; PRODUCT; SYSTEM; LIMITS; RULES; LAW;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：325 / 387

页数：63

相关论文

共 17 条

[1] CONCERTED REFUSALS TO DEAL UNDER THE FEDERAL ANTITRUST-LAWS
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1958, 71 (08) : 1531 - 1541
[2] PROVING INJURY TO COMPETITION IN PRIVATE ANTITRUST SUITS PROVOKED BY CONCERTED REFUSALS TO DEAL
不详
[J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1959, 68 (05): : 949 - 963
[3] REFUSALS TO DEAL UNDER THE FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAWS
Barber, Charles F.
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1955, 103 (07) : 847 - 885
[4] CONCERTED REFUSALS TO DEAL - A PERSE VIOLATION OF THE SHERMAN ACT
不详
[J]. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 1956, 51 (05) : 628 - 638
[5] SHERMAN ACT LIMITATIONS ON NONCOMMERCIAL CONCERTED REFUSALS TO DEAL
COLEMANBIRD, C
[J]. DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 1970, (02) : 247 - 292
[6] Concerted refusals to deal under section 1 of the Sherman Act
Glazer, KL
[J]. ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL, 2002, 70 (01) : 1 - 65
[7] Competitive price discrimination as an antitrust justification for intellectual property refusals to deal
Klein, B
Wiley, JS
[J]. ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL, 2003, 70 (03) : 599 - 642
[8] CONCERTED REFUSALS TO DEAL WITH NON-BUSINESS CONSUMERS UNDER SHERMAN ACT
HARWI, DB
[J]. TEMPLE LAW QUARTERLY, 1968, 41 (03): : 311 - 324
[9] CONCERTED REFUSALS TO DEAL BY NON-BUSINESS GROUPS - A CRITIQUE OF MISSOURI V NOW
LAUFMAN, MS
[J]. GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 1980, 49 (01) : 143 - 166
[10] The next logical step: Articulating a consumer-oriented standard for evaluating concerted refusals to deal
Jacobson, ES
[J]. RUTGERS LAW REVIEW, 2001, 53 (03) : 745 - 779