Decentralization is Vulnerable Under the Gap Game

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Yiran [1 ]
Ke, Junming [1 ]
Xu, Qiuliang [2 ]
Jiang, Han [2 ]
Wang, Hao [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Jinan 25100, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Sch Software, Jinan 250100, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Normal Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Jinan 250358, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2019年 / 7卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Blockchain security; decentralization; reward; gap game; mining; BITCOIN;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927257
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The blockchain is the core mechanism of Bitcoin, which is mainly enabled by a distributed consensus mechanism. Essentially, in Proof-of-Work-based consensus protocol, the miners generate a series of blocks to realize decentralization practical. Miners receive two types of revenue: block rewards and transaction fees, in which the reward of block drops off as time goes on. Carlsten et al. defined a mining gap and then Tsabary et al. analyzed the gap game exploring how mining gaps form. In this paper, we analyze the other implications of the gap game. First, it is well known that the security of Bitcoin decentralized consensus protocol relies on miners behaving correctly. The security of the blockchain system will be threatened in case of the consensus mechanism is breached. Therefore, we also described how the gap game impacts the decentralization of Bitcoin and the stability of blockchain. Second, to confirm the implication, we discuss what aspects of decentralization can be impacted by the gap game; then we defined a new decentralization model and listed its main features. In the end, we analyze the block reward capacity in the blockchain and consider the impact on the existing two common block reward systems when the gap game was formed.
引用
收藏
页码:90999 / 91008
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Gap Game
    Tsabary, Itay
    Eyal, Ittay
    [J]. SYSTOR'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH ACM INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS AND STORAGE CONFERENCE, 2018, : 132 - 132
  • [2] The Gap Game
    Tsabary, Itay
    Eyal, Ittay
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM SIGSAC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (CCS'18), 2018, : 713 - 728
  • [3] Portfolio Allocation under Decentralization
    Falco-Gimeno, Albert
    [J]. PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 2014, 44 (01) : 205 - 225
  • [4] Mind the Gap: 3.11 and the Information Vulnerable
    Ryuma, Shineha
    Mikihito, Tanaka
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL-JAPAN FOCUS, 2014, 12 (07):
  • [5] Intergovernmental communication under decentralization
    Bo, Shiyu
    Deng, Liuchun
    Sun, Yufeng
    Wang, Boqun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2021, 184 : 606 - 652
  • [6] Decentralization cost in scheduling: A game-theoretic approach
    Bukchin, Yossi
    Hanany, Eran
    [J]. M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2007, 9 (03) : 263 - 275
  • [7] ALGORITHM OF CONSTRUCTION OF GAME STRATEGY THAT USES DECENTRALIZATION AND LEARNING
    LINKIN, VM
    LOBANOV, VI
    NAUMOV, BP
    [J]. AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1977, 38 (06) : 894 - 900
  • [8] Game Analysis on Fiscal and Taxation Reform and Fiscal Decentralization
    Yang Zhaiting
    [J]. 学术界, 2018, (09) : 272 - 288
  • [9] THE INFLUENCE OF DECENTRALIZATION ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GAP BETWEEN REGIONS
    Laboutkova, Sarka
    Bednarova, Pavla
    Kocourek, Ales
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2012, : 634 - 645
  • [10] Treatment of depression in vulnerable populations: Narrowing the gap
    Mulsant, BH
    Harman, JS
    Kelleher, KJ
    Schulberg, HC
    Kupfer, DJ
    Reynolds, CF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (04): : 399 - 400