Prospective comparison of commercially available rapid urease tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori

被引:97
|
作者
Laine, L
Lewin, D
Naritoku, W
Estrada, R
Cohen, H
机构
[1] GI Division (LAC 12-137), U.S.C. School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70002-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Rapid urease testing is the initial endoscopic test of choice for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Determination of the relative diagnostic yields and times to a positive test for the different rapid urease tests is important for endoscopists. We compared three commercially available tests using histologic examination and culture as a gold standard. Methods: Patients undergoing upper endoscopy had six biopsy specimens taken from the antrum and six from the body with a large-channel biopsy forceps. Each set of six specimens was divided as follows: one each for CLOtest, Hpfast, and Pyloritek rapid urease tests; one for culture; and two for histologic examination (H&E, Genta). All tests were read every 15 minutes for 1 hour; the final reading for Pyloritek was at 1 hour. CLOtest and Hpfast were also read at 4 hours and 24 hours. Results: One hundred seventy-th ree sets of biopsy specimens from 87 patients were evaluated; 98 (57%) of the 173 sets were positive for ii. pylori by histologic examination and/or culture. The mean and median times to a positive test were significantly less for Pyloritek (0.5 +/-: 0.02 hour and 0.5 hour) than for CLOtest (2.0 +/- 0.6 hour and 0.75 hour) or Hpfast (2.2 +/- 0.6 hour and 0.5 hour). The sensitivities at the final readings were similar among the three tests (CLOtest: 93%; Hpfast: 88%; Pyloritek: 89%), but sensitivities at 1 hour were significantly better for Pyloritek (89%) than for CLOtest (71%) or Hpfast (66%). At 4 hours, sensitivities for CLOtest and Hpfast improved significantly and were not significantly different from those of Pyloritek. Specificities were 99% to 100% at all times for all three tests. Conclusion: The three rapid urease tests, CLOtest, Hpfast, and Pyloritek, provide comparable results, with sensitivities around 90% and specificities around 100%. The Pyloritek becomes positive more rapidly than the CLOtest or Hpfast. If a reading is desired within 1 hour, the Pyloritek provides a greater sensitivity than the CLOtest or Hpfast without any sacrifice in specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 526
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective comparison of commercially-available rapid urease tests for the diagnosis of H-pylori
    Laine, L
    Lewin, DN
    Naritoku, W
    Estrada, R
    Cohen, H
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (04) : A168 - A168
  • [2] Evaluation of two commercially available rapid stool antigen tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Metwally, Mohamed Abd ElAziz
    Alfeky, Hala Mohamed
    Alegaily, Hatem Samir
    Abbas, Azza Hasan
    El Shahat, El Shahat Ahmed
    Abd Elmonem, Angham Mohamed
    Gabal, Hoda Mohamed Rabie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2023, 17 (05): : 631 - 634
  • [3] Comparison of the Clinical Feasibility of Three Rapid Urease Tests in the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection
    Chang-An Tseng
    Wen-Ming Wang
    Deng-Chyang Wu
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2005, 50 : 449 - 452
  • [4] Comparison of the clinical feasibility of three rapid urease tests in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Tseng, CA
    Wang, WM
    Wu, DC
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2005, 50 (03) : 449 - 452
  • [5] Validation of a new, commercially available dry rapid urease test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric biopsies
    van Keeken, N.
    van Hattum, E.
    de Boer, W. A.
    [J]. NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 64 (09): : 329 - 333
  • [6] COMPARISON OF UREASE TESTS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER-PYLORI INFECTION
    MENEGATTI, M
    VAIRA, D
    MULE, P
    MIGLIOLI, M
    BARBARA, L
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 1993, 5 : S38 - S40
  • [7] FALSE NEGATIVITY OF RAPID UREASE TEST FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI DIAGNOSIS: COMPARISON WITH OTHER DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
    Losurdo, G.
    Francioso, F.
    Pricci, M.
    Girardi, B.
    Russo, F.
    Riezzo, G.
    Martulli, M.
    Pisani, A.
    Ierardi, E.
    Di Leo, A.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2021, 53 : S148 - S148
  • [8] Comparison of two rapid urease tests for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Chen, YK
    Godil, A
    Wat, PJ
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1998, 43 (08) : 1636 - 1640
  • [9] A prospective comparison of locally made rapid urease test and histology for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Chu, KM
    Poon, R
    Tuen, HH
    Law, SYK
    Branicki, FJ
    Wong, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 46 (06) : 503 - 506
  • [10] Comparison of Two Rapid Urease Tests for Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infection
    Yang K. Chen
    Aslam Godil
    Pamela J. Wat
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1998, 43 : 1636 - 1640