Smart integration of food and bioenergy production delivers on multiple ecosystem services

被引:12
|
作者
Koppelmaki, Kari [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lamminen, Marjukka [2 ,4 ]
Helenius, Juha [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Schulte, Rogier P. O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Farming Syst Ecol, POB 430, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Agr Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Ruralia Inst, Mikkeli, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, HELSUS Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci, Helsinki, Finland
来源
FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY | 2021年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
circularity; food-feed-fuel competition; renewable energy; soil functions; sustainable intensification; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS; LAND MANAGEMENT; CARBON STOCKS; SOIL CARBON; CROP YIELD; NITROGEN; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1002/fes3.279
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agriculture is expected to feed an increasing global population while at the same time meeting demands for renewable energy and the supply of ecosystem services such as provision of nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration. However, the current structure of the agricultural system works against meeting these expectations. The spatial separation of crop and livestock farms has created negative environmental consequences, and bioenergy production has created a trade-off between food and energy production. In this paper, we explore the opportunities for ecological intensification at a regional scale made possible by combining food and energy production. We built three scenarios representing farming systems including biogas production using grass biomass and manure. These scenarios included the following: (a) The current system with energy production (CSE) from non-edible agricultural biomasses (CSE). (b) Agroecological symbiosis (AES) identical to CSE except with 20% of the arable cropping area converted to clover-grasses for use in biogas production. (c) Agroecological symbiosis with livestock (AES-LST) where the available grass biomass (20% as in the AES) is fed to livestock and manure then used as a feedstock in biogas production. In each scenario, nutrients were circulated back to crops in the form of digestate. The supply of soil functions (primary production for food and energy, provision of nutrient cycling, and climate mitigation) and impacts on water quality through nutrient losses in these three scenarios were then compared to the current system. Integrating biogas production into food production resulted in an increased supply of nutrient recycling, reduced nutrient losses, and increased carbon inputs to the soils indicating enhanced climate mitigation. Food production was either not affected (CSE), increased (AES-LST), or decreased (AES), and biogas was produced in substantial quantities in each scenario. Our study demonstrated potential synergies in integrating food and energy production without compromising other ecosystem services in each scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 367
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of bioenergy production on ecosystem services
    Clarke, Nicholas
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2016, 31 (02) : 235 - 235
  • [2] Influence of Bioenergy Crop Production and Climate Change on Ecosystem Services
    Cibin, Raj
    Chaubey, Indrajeet
    Muenich, Rebecca L.
    Cherkauer, Keith A.
    Gassman, Philip W.
    Kling, Catherine L.
    Panagopoulos, Yiannis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2017, 53 (06): : 1323 - 1335
  • [3] Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes
    Werling, Ben P.
    Dickson, Timothy L.
    Isaacs, Rufus
    Gaines, Hannah
    Gratton, Claudio
    Gross, Katherine L.
    Liere, Heidi
    Malmstrom, Carolyn M.
    Meehan, Timothy D.
    Ruan, Leilei
    Robertson, Bruce A.
    Robertson, G. Philip
    Schmidt, Thomas M.
    Schrotenboer, Abbie C.
    Teal, Tracy K.
    Wilson, Julianna K.
    Landis, Douglas A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (04) : 1652 - 1657
  • [4] A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production
    Holland, R. A.
    Eigenbrod, F.
    Muggeridge, A.
    Brown, G.
    Clarke, D.
    Taylor, G.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 46 : 30 - 40
  • [5] Towards an Integration of Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning and Food Web Theory to Evaluate Relationships between Multiple Ecosystem Services
    Hines, Jes
    van der Putten, Wim H.
    De Deyn, Gerlinde B.
    Wagg, Cameron
    Voigt, Winfried
    Mulder, Christian
    Weisser, Wolfgang W.
    Engel, Jan
    Melian, Carlos
    Scheu, Stefan
    Birkhofer, Klaus
    Ebeling, Anne
    Scherber, Christoph
    Eisenhauer, Nico
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: FROM BIODIVERSITY TO SOCIETY, PT 1, 2015, 53 : 161 - 199
  • [6] The Impact of Invasive Buckthorn on Ecosystem Services and Its Potential for Bioenergy Production: A Review
    Boettcher, T. J.
    Gautam, Shuva
    Cook, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2023, 42 (02) : 218 - 240
  • [7] Algal bioenergy, ecosystem services and the Algal Bioenergy Special Interest Group
    [J]. Stanley, M. (michele.stanley@biosciencektn.com), 1600, Future Science Ltd (03):
  • [8] Algal bioenergy, ecosystem services and the Algal Bioenergy Special Interest Group
    Stanley, Michele
    MacDonald, Joanne
    Jenkins, Tom
    [J]. BIOFUELS-UK, 2012, 3 (03): : 255 - 258
  • [9] Ant biodiversity and ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes
    Helms, Jackson A.
    Ijelu, Selassie E.
    Wills, Bill D.
    Landis, Douglas A.
    Haddad, Nick M.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 290
  • [10] Mine waste rock as a soil amendment for enhanced weathering, ecosystem services, and bioenergy production
    Russell, Mackenzie D.
    Heckman, Katherine A.
    Pan, Lei
    Ye, Xinyu
    Zalesny, Ronald S.
    Kane, Evan S.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2024, 12