Comparison of Predictive Statistical Learning Accuracy with Computational Intelligence Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Marcek, Dusan [1 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Univ Opava, Inst Informat, Opava, Czech Republic
关键词
ARIMA models; SVR; Neural networks; Learning algorithms; Roulette wheel;
D O I
10.1109/informatics47936.2019.9119308
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Forecasting of high-frequency economic time series data is a complex problem, which has benefited from recent advancements and research in machine learning. To forecast time series data, two methodological frameworks of statistical and computational intelligence modelling are considered. The statistical methodological approach is based on the theory of invertible ARIMA (Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average) models. The Computational Intelligence (CI) models are based on neural networks (NN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). The main work of this study is to compare the predictive accuracy level of the statistical methodological approach with NN and SVM on the large data set. We evaluate statistical ML (Maximum Likelihood) learning method, Back-Propagation (BP) and genetic algorithms (GA) for half-hourly 1-step-ahead electricity demand prediction using Australian electricity data. We showed that all ARIMA, NN, SVM models as prediction methods are reasonable and acceptable for use in forecasting systems that routinely predict values of variables in competitive energy markets.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 322
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of computational intelligence and statistical methods in condition monitoring for hard turning
    Kothamasu, R
    Huang, SH
    Verduin, WH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (03) : 597 - 610
  • [2] Increasing the Production Accuracy of Profile Bending with Methods of Computational Intelligence
    Selvaggio, Alessandro
    Dirksen, Uwe
    Tekkaya, A. Erman
    Schikorra, Marco
    Kleiner, Matthias
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2009, 17 (04) : 561 - 576
  • [3] Computational Performance and Statistical Accuracy of *BEAST and Comparisons with Other Methods
    Ogilvie, Huw A.
    Heled, Joseph
    Xie, Dong
    Drummond, Alexei J.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2016, 65 (03) : 381 - 396
  • [4] Comparison of statistical methods commonly used in predictive modelling
    Muñoz, J
    Felicísimo, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (02) : 285 - 292
  • [5] Towards Improving Predictive Statistical Learning Model Accuracy by Enhancing Learning Technique
    Algarni, Ali
    Ragab, Mahmoud
    Alamri, Wardah
    Mostafa, Samih M.
    [J]. COMPUTER SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 42 (01): : 303 - 318
  • [6] Methods of computational intelligence
    Wilamowski, BM
    [J]. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Vols. 1- 3, 2004, : 1 - 8
  • [7] Computational intelligence for predicting corporate takeovers: A comparison of alternative methods
    Chu, CH
    Zhu, D
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2003, : 1187 - 1190
  • [8] A comparison of statistical learning methods on the GUSTO database
    Ennis, M
    Hinton, G
    Naylor, D
    Revow, M
    Tibshirani, R
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1998, 17 (21) : 2501 - 2508
  • [9] Computational intelligence with applications to general insurance: a review I - The role of statistical learning
    Parodi, Pietro
    [J]. ANNALS OF ACTUARIAL SCIENCE, 2012, 6 (02) : 307 - 343
  • [10] Comparison of computational methods for the evaluation of learning potential in schizophrenia
    Fiszdon, Joanna M.
    Johannesen, Jason K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 16 (04) : 613 - 620