The environmental and cost implications of solar energy preferences in Renewable Portfolio Standards

被引:31
|
作者
Novacheck, Joshua [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Jeremiah X. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Mech Engn, GG Brown Lab, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ctr Sustainable Syst, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Renewable Portfolio Standard; Economic dispatch; Solar energy policy; Renewable energy integration; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.039
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many state-level Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) include preferences for solar generation, with goals of increasing the generation diversity, reducing solar costs, and encouraging local solar industries. Depending on their policy design, these preferences can impact the RPS program costs and emissions reduction. This study evaluates the impact of these policies on costs and emissions, coupling an economic dispatch model with optimized renewable site selection. Three policy designs of an increased RPS in Michigan are investigated: (1) 20% Solar Carve-Out, (2) 5% Distributed Generation Solar Carve-Out, and (3) 3 x Solar Multiplier. The 20% Solar Carve-Out scenario was found to increase RPS costs 28%, while the 5% Distributed Generation Solar Carve-Out increased costs by 34%. Both of these solar preferences had minimal impact on total emissions. The 3 x Solar Multiplier decreases total RPS program costs by 39%, but adds less than half of the total renewable generation of the other cases, significantly increasing emissions of CO2, NOR, and SO2 relative to an RPS without the solar credit multiplier. Sensitivity analysis of the installed cost of solar and the natural gas price finds small changes in the results of the Carve-Out cases, with a larger impact on the 3 x Solar Multiplier. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 261
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Approximations in power transmission planning: implications for the cost and performance of renewable portfolio standards
    Munoz, Francisco D.
    Sauma, Enzo E.
    Hobbs, Benjamin F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2013, 43 (03) : 305 - 338
  • [2] Approximations in power transmission planning: implications for the cost and performance of renewable portfolio standards
    Francisco D. Munoz
    Enzo E. Sauma
    Benjamin F. Hobbs
    [J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2013, 43 : 305 - 338
  • [3] Funding renewable energy: An analysis of renewable portfolio standards
    Upton, Gregory B., Jr.
    Snyder, Brian F.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 66 : 205 - 216
  • [4] Renewable energy potential and adoption of renewable portfolio standards
    Upton, Gregory B., Jr.
    Snyder, Brian F.
    [J]. UTILITIES POLICY, 2015, 36 : 67 - 70
  • [5] Renewable portfolio standards and cost-effective energy-efficiency investment
    Mahone, A.
    Woo, C. K.
    Williams, J.
    Horowitz, I.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) : 774 - 777
  • [6] Energy, environmental and economic effects of Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in a Developing Country
    Farooq, Muhammad Khalid
    Kumar, S.
    Shrestha, Ram M.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 989 - 1001
  • [7] Renewable Portfolio Standards
    Feldman, Rachel
    Levinson, Arik
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2023, 44 (05): : 1 - 20
  • [8] Optimal Energy Mix with Renewable Portfolio Standards in Korea
    Geem, Zong Woo
    Kim, Jin-Hong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (05):
  • [9] The effects of renewables portfolio standards on renewable energy generation
    Pastor, Daniel J.
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2020, 40 (03): : 2121 - +
  • [10] Waste-to-energy, State Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), and the Future of Renewable Energy
    Brandes, William F.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL NORTH AMERICAN WASTE TO ENERGY CONFERENCE, NAWTEC20 2012, 2012, : 139 - 146