A Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Two Cogeneration Plants

被引:5
|
作者
Siddiqui, Osamah [1 ,2 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Clean Energy Res Lab, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[2] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
cogeneration; efficiency; environmental impacts; life-cycle assessment; NATURAL-GAS; POWER-GENERATION; COAL; SYSTEMS; SNG;
D O I
10.1002/ente.201900425
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Herein, a comparative energetic and life-cycle assessment (LCA) study is performed on coal and natural gas-based combined heat and power cogeneration plants. Different types of power plants, including gas turbine, steam turbine, and combined-cycle plants, are considered. Three types of LCA methodologies, including CML 2001, TRACI, and ReCiPe, are used to analyze the life-cycle environmental impacts of each plant. The coal-based cogeneration plant is found to entail the comparatively lowest life-cycle energy efficiency of 43.6%, and the natural gas-based combined-cycle cogeneration plant is found to have the highest efficiency of 59.6%. Furthermore, the coal-based life cycle is also found to entail the highest life-cycle environmental impacts comparatively. According to CML 2001, it entails a global-warming potential of 0.229 kg CO2eq MJ(-1) and an acidification potential of 7.03E-4 kg SO2eq MJ(-1). The natural gas-fired boiler-type cogeneration plant is observed to have a comparatively higher toxicity and eutrophication potential of 2.72E-4 kg DCBeq MJ(-1) and 2.78E-5 kg PO4eq MJ(-1), respectively. The lowest overall life-cycle environmental impacts comparatively are found to be associated with the natural gas-based combined-cycle cogeneration plant.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life-cycle assessment modelling and life-cycle assessment evaluation of a triboelement
    Wani, M. F.
    Anand, A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART J-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING TRIBOLOGY, 2010, 224 (J11) : 1209 - 1220
  • [2] Comparative life-cycle assessment of uranium extraction processes
    Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan
    Huda, Nazmul
    Mahmud, M. A. Parvez
    Lang, Candace
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 202 : 666 - 683
  • [3] DeltaLCA: Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment for Electronics Design
    Zhang, Zhihan
    Hahnlein, Felix
    Mei, Yuxuan
    Englhardt, Zachary
    Patel, Shwetak
    Schulz, Adriana
    Iyer, Vikram
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON INTERACTIVE MOBILE WEARABLE AND UBIQUITOUS TECHNOLOGIES-IMWUT, 2024, 8 (01):
  • [4] Innovation in charcoal production: A comparative life-cycle assessment of two kiln technologies in Brazil
    Bailis, Rob
    Rujanavech, Charissa
    Dwivedi, Puneet
    Vilela, Adriana de Oliveira
    Chang, Howard
    de Miranda, Rogerio Carneiro
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 17 (02) : 189 - 200
  • [5] LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    WEISSMAN, AB
    [J]. ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 11 (01) : 18 - 18
  • [6] Life-cycle assessment
    Harsch, M
    Schuckert, M
    Eyerer, P
    Saur, K
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 1996, 149 (06): : 43 - 46
  • [7] Life-cycle assessment
    Riebel, P
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2002, 103 (04) : 57 - 57
  • [8] Life-cycle assessment - An abridged life-cycle assessment of electric vehicle batteries
    Steele, NLC
    Allen, DT
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (01) : 40A - 46A
  • [9] Application of thermoeconomics to the allocation of environmental loads in the life cycle assessment of cogeneration plants
    González, A
    Sala, JM
    Flores, I
    López, LM
    [J]. ENERGY, 2003, 28 (06) : 557 - 574
  • [10] A comparative life-cycle assessment between NbTi and copper magnets
    Hartikainen, T
    Korpela, A
    Lehtonen, J
    Mikkonen, R
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2004, 14 (02) : 1882 - 1885