Valence and arousal ratings for Velten mood induction statements

被引:24
|
作者
Jennings, PD [1 ]
McGinnis, D
Lovejoy, S
Stirling, J
机构
[1] Care of McGinnis D, Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Psychol, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychol, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Chapman Univ, Dept Psychol, Orange, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1010745016868
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Participants rated 84 statements adapted from Velten's original mood induction statements-designed to induce positive and negative mood-on two dimensions of emotion (valence and arousal), using the Self Assessment Manikin (SAM) (P. J. Lang, M. M. Bradley, & B. N. Cuthbert, 1999). Fifty-two of these Velten positive, negative, and neutral statements yielded SAM valence ratings that were consistent with Velten's previous valence designation (E. Velten, 1968). Reliability analyses for the positive, negative, and neutral statements indicated a high level of internal consistency in the three statement groups. Arousal and valence ratings of the statements were postitively correlated. Related issues concerning differences in rating verbal versus visual emotional stimuli and recommendations for future work to improve the validity of Velten's mood induction statements are addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 297
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条