Reducing the water cost in livestock with adoption of best practices

被引:5
|
作者
Pascale Palhares, Julio Cesar [1 ]
Afonso, Esther R. [2 ]
Gameiro, Augusto H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Embrapa Southeast Livestock, Rod Washington Luiz Km 234, BR-13560970 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Vet & Anim Sci, Dept Anim Sci, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Consumption; Drinking water; Nutritional technologies; Nutrient balance; USE EFFICIENCY; MANAGEMENT; FARMERS; QUALITY; DEMAND; IMPACT; DIETS;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-018-0117-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aims of the study were to propose and evaluate a method to calculate the water cost in livestock production, considering best practices regarding nutritional and waste management. Diets with more nutritional advanced technologies and with the best waste management had the lowest total water cost in all farm sizes. Farmers that did not balance the diets considering nutritional technologies and that use manure as fertilizer with high environmental risk, without considering the nutrient balance, had the most expensive water. The cost of no-point source pollution in the total cost of water represented an average of 99.1% for NB=1.0, 98.8% for NB=0.75 and 98.3% for NB=0.5 for all diets. The percentage of consumption water prices in the total cost of water varied from 0.9 to 1.7%. The study shows that the aggregation of nutrition and waste management has a direct positive impact on the reduction in the cost of water, and indirect positive impacts on the reduction in natural resource consumption by the production system, as well as its polluting potential. The water cost method proposed could contribute to the ongoing debate with respect to sustainable intensification of livestock, and balance of their environmental and economic aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:2013 / 2023
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reducing the water cost in livestock with adoption of best practices
    Julio Cesar Pascale Palhares
    Esther R. Afonso
    Augusto H. Gameiro
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2019, 21 : 2013 - 2023
  • [2] MOTIVATING ADOPTION OF BEST MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES - IMPLICATIONS FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS
    KILLINGSWORTH, DG
    MATULICH, SC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1981, 63 (05) : 1039 - 1039
  • [3] Landowner Adoption of Water Quality Best Management Practices: Motivations and Barriers
    Dewald, Stacey S.
    Murphrey, Theresa P.
    Leggette, Holli R.
    Berthold, Allen
    Wagner, Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXTENSION, 2019, 57 (05):
  • [4] A river water pollution model for assessment of best management practices for livestock farming
    McGechan, M. B.
    Lewis, D. R.
    Vinten, A. J. A.
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2008, 99 (02) : 292 - 303
  • [5] REDUCING CAUTI WITH BEST PRACTICES
    Taylor, Ann Kahl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2014, 41 : S40 - S40
  • [6] Developing the Best Management Practices Cost and Adoption Survey for Florida Specialty Crop Growers
    Wade, Tara
    Roka, Fritz
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, VOL 131, 2018, 2018, 131 : 244 - 246
  • [7] Intention Versus Action: Household Adoption of Best Management Practices for Water Quality
    Fleming, Patrick M.
    Savchenko, Olesya M.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 58 (07)
  • [8] BEST MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES FOR LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION
    SAFLEY, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1994, 49 (02) : 57 - 62
  • [9] Adoption Consents: Legal Incentives for Best Practices
    Samuels, Elizabeth
    [J]. ADOPTION QUARTERLY, 2006, 10 (01) : 85 - 98
  • [10] Identifying Key Factors in Homeowner’s Adoption of Water Quality Best Management Practices
    Joan M. Brehm
    Danielle K. Pasko
    Brian W. Eisenhauer
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2013, 52 : 113 - 122