Computing Tools for Implementing Standards for Single-Case Designs

被引:22
|
作者
Chen, Li-Ting [1 ]
Peng, Chao-Ying Joanne [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Ming-E [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Ctr Res Learning & Technol, Bloomington, IN 47406 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Inquiry Methodol, Bloomington, IN 47406 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Stat, Bloomington, IN 47406 USA
关键词
single-case design; intervention; effect; WWC; standards; computing; software; GENERALIZED LEAST-SQUARES; DIFFERENCE EFFECT SIZE; BASE-LINE DESIGNS; VISUAL ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS; SUBJECT RESEARCH; N-OF-1; TRIALS; QUALITY; PERCENTAGE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0145445515603706
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In the single-case design (SCD) literature, five sets of standards have been formulated and distinguished: design standards, assessment standards, analysis standards, reporting standards, and research synthesis standards. This article reviews computing tools that can assist researchers and practitioners in meeting the analysis standards recommended by the What Works Clearinghouse: Procedures and Standards Handbookthe WWC standards. These tools consist of specialized web-based calculators or downloadable software for SCD data, and algorithms or programs written in Excel, SAS procedures, SPSS commands/Macros, or the R programming language. We aligned these tools with the WWC standards and evaluated them for accuracy and treatment of missing data, using two published data sets. All tools were tested to be accurate. When missing data were present, most tools either gave an error message or conducted analysis based on the available data. Only one program used a single imputation method. This article concludes with suggestions for an inclusive computing tool or environment, additional research on the treatment of missing data, and reasonable and flexible interpretations of the WWC standards.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 869
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条