A systematic literature review of non-market valuation of Indigenous peoples' values: Current knowledge, best-practice and framing questions for future research

被引:11
|
作者
Manero, Ana [1 ]
Taylor, Kat [1 ]
Nikolakis, William [2 ]
Adamowicz, Wiktor [3 ]
Marshall, Virginia [4 ]
Spencer-Cotton, Alaya [5 ]
Nguyen, Mai [1 ]
Grafton, R. Quentin [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, JG Crawford Bldg,132 Lennox Crossing, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, Forest Sci Ctr Main Mall 2424, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Fac Agr Life & Environm Sci, 501 Gen Serv Bldg,9007-116 St NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Regulat & Global Governance, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, B141,B48,B48A,Linnaeus Way, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, UWA Sch Agr & Environm, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Non-market valuation; Indigenous peoples values; Ecosystem services; Environmental valuation; CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; STATED PREFERENCE; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; PATERNALISTIC ALTRUISM; CONTINGENT VALUATION; RESOURCE VALUATION; SAVANNA RESOURCES; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HERITAGE VALUES; SOCIAL IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101417
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Non-market valuation (NMV) can be effective to understand the value people place on ecosystem goods and services for which there are no market prices. Over the last 20 years, NMV has increasingly been applied to Indigenous contexts, albeit with important conceptual and methodological limitations. We conduct a global systematic literature review and detailed meta-synthesis of 63 peer-reviewed studies on NMV research applied to Indigenous peoples' values. Selected studies are categorized by methods, year of publication, geographic area and ecosystem components. Australia (n = 19), the USA (n = 9) and Canada (n = 8) account for over half of all articles. Important knowledge gaps remain in the NMV peer-reviewed literature for other geographic areas. Our taxonomy based on 'whose values' and 'which values' reveals that a large proportion of studies (n = 24) focused on values held by Indigenous peoples, predominately on direct-use values (n = 12) and total economic values (n = 10). Studies based on the general population (n = 17) typically examined altruistic and/or existence values (n = 15). Our analysis identified seven main strategies used by previous studies to overcome critical limitations of NMV when applied to Indigenous peoples' values. Strategies include: (1) engaging directly and ethically with Indigenous peoples; (2) investigating multi-dimensional values; (3) valuing health benefits; (4) adopting non monetary payment vehicles; (5) using market prices for valuation; (6) sampling the broad population; and (7) investigating non-cumulative values. Based on this review, we provide seven critical questions to guide future NMV research: (1) What is the purpose?; (2) How does Indigenous knowledge inform NMV?; (3) Who benefits?, (4) What ethical frameworks apply?; (5) Whose values are considered?; (6) What is the expected change?; and (7) How are NMV limitations handled? Our contribution provides researchers and policy-makers with the most upto-date review of the state-of-knowledge and suggestions for best-practice on the use of NMV methods when applied to Indigenous peoples' values.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Non-market valuation and Indigenous Peoples' values: researcher constraints and policy impacts
    Manero, Ana
    Nikolakis, William
    Woods, Kaely
    Grafton, R. Quentin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2024, 153
  • [2] Current Issue on Knowledge Management System for future research: a Systematic Literature Review
    Iskandar, Karto
    Jambak, Muhammad Ikhwan
    Kosala, Raymondus
    Prabowo, Harjanto
    [J]. DISCOVERY AND INNOVATION OF COMPUTER SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ERA, 2017, 116 : 68 - 80
  • [3] Communicating Environmental Health Risks with Indigenous Populations: A Systematic Literature Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Studies
    Boyd, Amanda D.
    Furgal, Chris M.
    [J]. HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2019, 34 (13) : 1564 - 1574
  • [4] A review of elasmobranch catch-and-release science: synthesis of current knowledge, implications for best practice and future research directions
    Cameron, Luke W. J.
    Roche, William K.
    Beckett, Katy
    Payne, Nicholas L.
    [J]. CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 11 (01):
  • [5] A systematic literature review of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in mathematics education: Future challenges for educational practice and research
    Kholid, Muhammad Noor
    Hendriyanto, Agus
    Sahara, Sani
    Muhaimin, Lukman Hakim
    Juandi, Dadang
    Sujadi, Imam
    Kuncoro, Krida Singgih
    Adnan, Mazlini
    [J]. COGENT EDUCATION, 2023, 10 (02):
  • [6] Update on best current practice of non-pharmacological interventions reducing preoperative anxiety in children, a semi-systematic literature review
    Desmet, V
    Kuijpers, S.
    Boons, J.
    Van de Velde, M.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA, 2021, 72 : 77 - 86