共 50 条
Mutant KRAS Circulating Tumor DNA Is an Accurate Tool for Pancreatic Cancer Monitoring
被引:72
|作者:
Perets, Ruth
[1
,3
]
Greenberg, Orli
[4
]
Shentzer, Talia
[1
]
Semenisty, Valeria
[1
]
Epelbaum, Ron
[1
,3
]
Bick, Tova
[2
]
Sarji, Shada
[2
]
Ben-Izhak, Ofer
[2
,3
]
Sabo, Edmond
[2
,3
]
Hershkovitz, Dov
[4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Oncol, Haifa, Israel
[2] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Pathol, Haifa, Israel
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Haifa, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
来源:
关键词:
Pancreatic cancer;
Adenocarcinoma;
KRAS;
Circulating tumor DNA;
Liquid biopsy;
Cancer monitoring;
LUNG-CANCER;
COMBINATION THERAPY;
EXOSOMES;
GEMCITABINE;
RESISTANCE;
CA19-9;
ADENOCARCINOMA;
BIOMARKERS;
MANAGEMENT;
PROGNOSIS;
D O I:
10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0467
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background. Many new pancreatic cancer treatment combinations have been discovered in recent years, yet the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains grim. The advent of new treatments highlights the need for better monitoring tools for treatment response, to allow a timely switch between different therapeutic regimens. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a tool for cancer detection and characterization with growing clinical use. However, currently, ctDNA is not used for monitoring treatment response. The high prevalence of KRAS hotspot mutations in PDAC suggests that mutant KRAS can be an efficient ctDNA marker for PDAC monitoring. Subjects, Materials, and Methods. Seventeen metastatic PDAC patients were recruited and serial plasma samples were collected. CtDNA was extracted from the plasma, and KRAS mutation analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing and correlated with serum CA19-9 levels, imaging, and survival. Results. Plasma KRAS mutations were detected in 5/17 (29.4%) patients. KRAS ctDNA detection was associated with shorter survival (8 vs. 37.5 months). Our results show that, in ctDNA positive patients, ctDNA is at least comparable to CA19-9 as a marker for monitoring treatment response. Furthermore, the rate of ctDNA change was inversely correlated with survival. Conclusion. Our results confirm that mutant KRAS ctDNA detection in metastatic PDAC patients is a poor prognostic marker. Additionally, we were able to show that mutant KRAS ctDNA analysis can be used to monitor treatment response in PDAC patients and that ctDNA dynamics is associated with survival. We suggest that ctDNA analysis in metastatic PDAC patients is a readily available tool for disease monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 572
页数:7
相关论文