Comparing methods for joint objective and subjective uncertainty propagation with an example in a risk assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Baudrit, Cedric [1 ]
Dubois, Didier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse 3, Inst Rech Informat Toulouse, F-31062 Toulouse 4, France
关键词
Imprecise Probabilities; Possibility; Belief functions; Probability-Boxes; Dependency Bounds;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Probability-boxes, numerical possibility theory and belief functions have been suggested as useful tools to represent imprecise, vague or incomplete information. They are particularly appropriate in environmental risk assessment where information is typically tainted with imprecision or incompleteness. Based on these notions, we present and compare four different methods to propagate objective and subjective uncertainties through multivariate functions. Lastly, we use these different techniques on an environmental real case of soil contamination by lead on an ironworks brownfield.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 40
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of subjective and objective caries risk assessment methods
    Ravi, Karthikayan
    Prasad, Vishnu
    Priyadharsini, Indra
    Jagadeson, Mahesh
    JOURNAL OF ORAL HEALTH AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 13 (02): : 67 - 71
  • [2] Risk assessment: Subjective or objective?
    Campbell, Harry
    Engineering Science and Education Journal, 1998, 7 (02): : 57 - 63
  • [3] A flexible risk assessment approach integrating subjective and objective weights under uncertainty
    Wen, Ta-Chun
    Chung, Hsiang-Yu
    Chang, Kuei-Hu
    Li, Zong-Sian
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 103
  • [4] On Risk and Uncertainty, and Objective versus Subjective Probability
    Sharpe, Keiran
    ECONOMIC RECORD, 2018, 94 : 49 - 72
  • [5] A Novel Network Security Risk Assessment Approach by Combining Subjective and Objective Weights under Uncertainty
    Duan, Yancui
    Cai, Yonghua
    Wang, Zhikang
    Deng, Xinyang
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [6] Water Resources Risk Assessment Model based on the Subjective and Objective Combination Weighting Methods
    Jun Zhao
    Juliang Jin
    Jiezhong Zhu
    Jinchao Xu
    Qingfeng Hang
    Yaqian Chen
    Donghao Han
    Water Resources Management, 2016, 30 : 3027 - 3042
  • [7] Water Resources Risk Assessment Model based on the Subjective and Objective Combination Weighting Methods
    Zhao, Jun
    Jin, Juliang
    Zhu, Jiezhong
    Xu, Jinchao
    Hang, Qingfeng
    Chen, Yaqian
    Han, Donghao
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (09) : 3027 - 3042
  • [8] Assessment of fused images: Objective, subjective, and computational methods
    Dixon, TD
    Canga, E
    Noyes, J
    Troscianko, T
    Bull, D
    Canagarajah, N
    PERCEPTION, 2006, 35 (03) : 422 - 422
  • [9] Underwater Image Quality Assessment: Subjective and Objective Methods
    Guo, Pengfei
    He, Lang
    Liu, Shuangyin
    Zeng, Delu
    Liu, Hantao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2022, 24 : 1980 - 1989
  • [10] Methods for uncertainty propagation in life cycle assessment
    Groen, E. A.
    Heijungs, R.
    Bokkers, E. A. M.
    de Boer, I. J. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 62 : 316 - 325