Etomidate versus midazolam for out-of-hospital intubation: A prospective, randomized trial

被引:35
|
作者
Jacoby, J
Heller, M
Nicholas, J
Patel, N
Cesta, M
Smith, G
Jacob, S
Reed, J
机构
[1] St Lukes Hosp, Emergency Med Residency, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[2] Bethlehem Township EMS, Bethlehem, PA USA
[3] Bethlehem City EMS, Bethlehem, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.009
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: The primary objective of this study is to compare the intubation success rates of etomidate and midazolam when used for sedative-facilitated intubation, without paralytics, in out-of-hospital adult patients. Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized trial was conducted with 2 ground out-of-hospital advanced life support systems (ALS); all patients aged 18 or older who required out-of-hospital sedative-facilitated intubation were eligible for participation. The ambulances were stocked with blinded numbered syringes containing either 7 mg of midazolam or 20 mg of etomidate. No paralytics were used. If sedation was not achieved with the study drug, medics could request additional sedation from a medical command physician; only midazolam or diazepam were available outside of the study. Results: One hundred ten patients were enrolled in the study; 55 patients received midazolam and 55 patients received etomidate. The 2 groups were similar with regard to age, sex, initial vital signs, and reasons for intubation or sedation. The overall intubation success rate was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 84%); 75% (41/55) for midazolam (95% CI 64% to 86%) and 76% (42/55) for etomidate (95% CI 65% to 87%). There was also no difference in incidence of hypotension, number of intubation attempts, or perceived difficulty of intubation. Additional sedation was requested almost equally for the 2 groups: 14 patients in the midazolam group and 12 patients in the etomidate group. A benzodiazepine was successful for rescue of a failed etomidate intubation 10 of 12 times (83%; 95% CI 62% to 100%). When used for rescue of failed midazolam intubations, benzodiazepines were effective in only 5 of 14 (36%, 95% CI 11% to 61%) attempts. Conclusion: There were no observed differences between midazolam and etomidate in sedation-facilitated intubation success rates; we could not fully evaluate global outcomes of these agents or the sedative-facilitated intubation strategy itself.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 530
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Etomidate versus midazolam for out-of-hospital intubation: A prospective randomized trial
    Jacoby, JL
    Nicolas, J
    Cesta, M
    McGee, J
    Heller, MB
    Reed, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (04) : S48 - S48
  • [2] Ketamine Versus Midazolam for Out-of-Hospital Agitation: A Prospective Study
    Cole, J.
    Klein, L. R.
    Scharber, S. K.
    Simpson, N. S.
    Driver, B. E.
    Arens, A. M.
    Nystrom, P. C.
    Olives, T. D.
    Moore, J. C.
    Ho, J. D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (04) : S1 - S2
  • [3] EMERGENCY INTUBATION WITH VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPY: PRELIMINARY DATA OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER OUT-OF-HOSPITAL TRIAL
    Janssen, S.
    Reifferscheid, F.
    Doerges, V.
    Knacke, P.
    Carnes, A.
    Cavus, E.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 118 : S1 - S1
  • [4] Etomidate and midazolam for procedural sedation: prospective, randomized trial
    Hunt, GS
    Spencer, MT
    Hays, DP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (03): : 299 - 303
  • [5] Prospective evaluation of etomidate with and without the addition of succinylcholine for rapid sequence intubation of head injured patients in the out-of-hospital setting
    O'Connor, R. E.
    McGinnis-Hainsworth, D.
    Megargel, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 50 (03) : S2 - S2
  • [6] Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
    Matchett, Gerald
    Gasanova, Irina
    Riccio, Christina A.
    Nasir, Dawood
    Sunna, Mary C.
    Bravenec, Brian J.
    Azizad, Omaira
    Farrell, Brian
    Minhajuddin, Abu
    Stewart, Jesse W.
    Liang, Lawrence W.
    Moon, Tiffany Sun
    Fox, Pamela E.
    Ebeling, Callie G.
    Smith, Miakka N.
    Trousdale, Devin
    Ogunnaike, Babatunde O.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 48 (01) : 78 - 91
  • [7] Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
    Gerald Matchett
    Irina Gasanova
    Christina A. Riccio
    Dawood Nasir
    Mary C. Sunna
    Brian J. Bravenec
    Omaira Azizad
    Brian Farrell
    Abu Minhajuddin
    Jesse W. Stewart
    Lawrence W. Liang
    Tiffany Sun Moon
    Pamela E. Fox
    Callie G. Ebeling
    Miakka N. Smith
    Devin Trousdale
    Babatunde O. Ogunnaike
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2022, 48 : 78 - 91
  • [8] Out-of-hospital intubation of children
    Glaeser, P
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (06): : 797 - 798
  • [9] Etomidate and midazolam for procedural sedation: Prospective trial
    Hunt, GS
    Spencer, MT
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (04) : S40 - S40
  • [10] Etomidate versus midazolam for procedural sedation in pediatric outpatients: A randomized controlled trial
    Di Liddo, Lydia
    D'Angelo, Antonio
    Nguyen, Bao
    Bailey, Benoit
    Amre, Devendra
    Stanciu, Constantin
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (04) : 433 - 440