Lexical selection differences between monolingual and bilingual listeners

被引:12
|
作者
Friesen, Deanna C. [1 ]
Chung-Fat-Yim, Ashley [1 ]
Bialystok, Ellen [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Dept Psychol, 4700 Kee St, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Bilingualism; Lexical selection; Conflict resolution; Event-related potentials; NAME AGREEMENT; TIME-COURSE; COMPONENT; INTERFERENCE; TRANSLATION; FAMILIARITY; LANGUAGES; PICTURES; NORMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandl.2015.11.001
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Three studies are reported investigating how monolinguals and bilinguals resolve within-language competition when listening to isolated words. Participants saw two pictures that were semantically-related, phonologically-related, or unrelated and heard a word naming one of them while event-related potentials were recorded. In Studies 1 and 2, the pictures and auditory cue were presented simultaneously and the related conditions produced interference for both groups. Monolinguals showed reduced N400s to the semantically-related pairs but there was no modulation in this component by bilinguals. Study 3 inserted an interval between picture and word onset. For picture onset, both groups exhibited reduced N400s to semantically-related pictures; for word onset, both groups showed larger N400s to phonologically-related pictures. Overall, bilinguals showed less integration of related items in simultaneous (but not sequential) presentation, presumably because of interference from the activated non-English language. Thus, simple lexical selection for bilinguals includes more conflict than it does for monolinguals. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条