Modeling and design optimization of a robot gripper mechanism

被引:41
|
作者
Hassan, Alaa [1 ]
Abomoharam, Mouhammad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lorraine, ERPI, Nancy, France
[2] HIAST, Damascus, Syria
关键词
Robot modeling; Multicriteria design optimization; NSGA-II; Sensitivity analysis; PARALLEL; MANIPULATOR; INVERSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcim.2016.12.012
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Structure modeling and optimizing are important topics for the design and control of robots. In this paper, we propose a process for modeling robots and optimizing their structure. This process is illustrated via a case study of a robot gripper mechanism that has a closed-loop and a single degree of freedom (DOF) structure. Our aim is to conduct a detailed study of the gripper in order to provide an in-depth step-by-step demonstration of the design process and to illustrate the interactions among its steps. First, geometric model is established to find the relationship between the operational coordinates giving the location of the end-effector and the joint coordinates. Then, equivalent Jacobian matrix is derived to find the kinematic model; and the dynamic model is obtained using Lagrange formulation. Based on these models, a structural multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem is formalised in the static configuration of the gripper. The objective is to determine the optimum force extracted by the robot gripper on the surface of a grasped rigid object under geometrical and functional constraints. The optimization problem of the gripper design is solved using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm version II (NSGA-II). The Pareto-optimal solutions are investigated to establish some meaningful relationships between the objective functions and variable values. Finally, design sensitivity analysis is carried out to compute the sensitivity of objective functions with respect to design variables.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 103
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multicriteria design optimization of robot gripper mechanisms
    Krenich, S
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON EVOLUTIONARY METHODS IN MECHANICS, 2004, 117 : 207 - 218
  • [2] Robust design of a robot gripper mechanism using new hybrid grasshopper optimization algorithm
    Yildiz, Betul Sultan
    Pholdee, Nantiwat
    Bureerat, Sujin
    Yildiz, Ali Riza
    Sait, Sadiq M.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2021, 38 (03)
  • [3] Structural Optimization Design of Dual Robot Gripper Unloading Device Based on Intelligent Optimization Algorithms and Generative Design
    Jia, Jiguang
    Sun, Xuan
    Liu, Ting
    Tang, Jiazhi
    Wang, Jiabing
    Hu, Xianxuan
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (19)
  • [4] Design of Robot Gripper with Topology Optimization and Its Fabrication Using Additive Manufacturing
    Sugavaneswaran, M.
    Rajesh, N.
    Sathishkumar, N.
    ADVANCES IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AND JOINING, AIMTDR 2018, 2020, : 75 - 85
  • [5] Multi-objective reliability-based robust design optimization of robot gripper mechanism with probabilistically uncertain parameters
    Gholaminezhad, Iman
    Jamali, Ali
    Assimi, Hirad
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2017, 28 : S659 - S670
  • [6] Multi-objective reliability-based robust design optimization of robot gripper mechanism with probabilistically uncertain parameters
    Iman Gholaminezhad
    Ali Jamali
    Hirad Assimi
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2017, 28 : 659 - 670
  • [7] A piezoelectric model based multi-objective optimization of robot gripper design
    Datta, Rituparna
    Jain, Ajinkya
    Bhattacharya, Bishakh
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2016, 53 (03) : 453 - 470
  • [8] Optimal Design of Robot Gripper Mechanism using Force and Displacement Transmission Ratio
    Krenich, Stanislaw
    INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE ROBOTICS, 2014, 613 : 117 - 125
  • [9] Multifunctional Gripper Design at the End of the Robot
    AI Sheng
    CHEN Yitao
    Instrumentation, 2022, 9 (04) : 17 - 25
  • [10] A piezoelectric model based multi-objective optimization of robot gripper design
    Rituparna Datta
    Ajinkya Jain
    Bishakh Bhattacharya
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 53 : 453 - 470