Measuring Spatial Accessibility of Public Transport: The Case of the New Urban Rail Systems in the City of Thessaloniki, Greece

被引:0
|
作者
Baraklianos, Ioannis [1 ]
Karagouni, Konstandina [2 ]
Papagiannakis, Apostolos [2 ]
机构
[1] ENTPE, Transport Urban Planning Econ Lab, Lyon, France
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Spatial Planning & Dev, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Accessibility measures; Transport planning; Urban railway systems; Public transport; Thessaloniki;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_7
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper aims to evaluate the level of spatial accessibility of the new urban rail systems in the city of Thessaloniki, that is the metropolitan network under construction by Attiko Metro S.A. and the proposed tramway lines by Thessaloniki Public Transport Authority. Accessibility measures constitute a suitable planning tool for assessing the spatial impacts of transport scenarios, the transport networks connectivity and the land use transport interactions. In this research, location-based measures were applied, such as the integral, the isochronic and the potential accessibility indicators. The 2011 population census data in reference to the city block level and the origin-destination travel time data between the 68 future urban rail stations (simulated by GIS software) were used to calculate the relevant indicators. Thus, population accessibility was measured rather than opportunity accessibility, which is the usual research practice, due to the lack of adequate employment or land use data at the city block level. Nevertheless, the results can be interpreted as the potential attractiveness of the new urban rail stations. The analysis outlines the connectivity weaknesses of the proposed Metro and Tram system and therefore the direction for possible improvements on the urban rail network spatial coverage.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of benchmarking in public transport: The case of Thessaloniki, Greece
    Georgiadis, Georgios
    [J]. TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA 2012, 2012, 48 : 2577 - 2587
  • [2] Public Transport Integration: the Case Study of Thessaloniki, Greece
    Saliara, Klotildi
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY IN METROPOLITAN REGIONS, MOBIL.TUM 2014, 2014, 4 : 535 - 552
  • [3] Measuring spatial accessibility of urban parks: A case study of Qingdao City, China
    Yin, Haiwei
    Song, Yongjun
    Kong, Fanhua
    Qi, Yi
    [J]. GEOINFORMATICS 2007: GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, PTS 1 AND 2, 2007, 6753
  • [4] Social Dimensions of Spatial Justice in the Use of the Public Transport System in Thessaloniki, Greece
    Tzanni, Olga
    Nikolaou, Paraskevas
    Giannakopoulou, Stella
    Arvanitis, Apostolos
    Basbas, Socrates
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [5] Urban water demand management - The city of Thessaloniki-Greece case study
    Mylopoulos, Y
    Kolokytha, E
    Mentes, A
    Vagiona, D
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2003, : 721 - 726
  • [6] Nonlinear effects of public transport accessibility on urban development: A case study of mountainous city
    Gao, Li
    Chong, Heap-Yih
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Zhenyang
    [J]. CITIES, 2023, 138
  • [7] Urban public transport system accessibility for different groups of residents: Case of Bratislava city
    Hlusko, Richard
    Stanek, Richard
    Durcek, Pavol
    Kusendova, Dagmar
    [J]. CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2024, 16
  • [8] Measuring spatial inequality of urban park accessibility and utilisation: A case study of public housing developments in Auckland, New Zealand
    Colbert, Jessie
    Chuang, I-Ting
    Sila-Nowicka, Katarzyna
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 247
  • [9] Study of the urban heat island in a coastal Mediterranean City: The case study of Thessaloniki, Greece
    Giannaros, Theodore M.
    Melas, Dimitrios
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2012, 118 : 103 - 120
  • [10] MEASURING WALKING ACCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC TRANSPORT OF THE ELDERLY: THE CASE OF NAPLES
    Papa, Enrica
    Carpentieri, Gerardo
    Guida, Carmen
    [J]. TEMA-JOURNAL OF LAND USE MOBILITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, : 105 - 116