K88 adhesins of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and their porcine enterocyte receptors

被引:0
|
作者
Francis, DH [1 ]
Erickson, AK [1 ]
Grange, PA [1 ]
机构
[1] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Vet Sci, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The three antigenic variants of the K88 fimbrial adhesin (K88ab, K88ac, and K88ad) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) each exhibit unique specificity with regard to their hemagglutination characteristics. The variants are also unique in the specificity of their binding to the brush borders of enterocytes isolated from pigs with different genetic backgrounds, Diversity in enterocyte binding specificity suggests the existence of several K88 receptors, expressed individually or in various combinations on porcine enterocytes. Three candidate receptors have been identified that may explain the adhesion of K88 fimbrial variants to various porcine enterocytes. These receptors are an intestinal mucin-type sialoglycoprotein (IMTGP), an intestinal transferrin (GP74), and an intestinal neutral glycosphingolipid (IGLad). The IMTGP binds K88ab and K88ac, but not K88ad, The GP74 binds K88ab, but not K88ac or K88ad, and the IGLad binds K88ad, but not K88ab or K88ac, Each of the candidate receptors has been found in brush borders that are adhesive for the fimbriae that bind the respective receptor. They have not been found in brush borders that are not adhesive for those same fimbriae. The presence of IMTGP was highly correlated with susceptibility of neonatal gnotobiotic pigs to ETEC expressing K88ab or K88ac.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The metabolic impact of zinc oxide on porcine intestinal cells and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88
    Sargeant, Hannah R.
    Shaw, Marie-Anne
    AbuOun, Manal
    Collins, James W.
    Woodward, Martin J.
    La Ragione, Roberto M.
    Miller, Helen M.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2010, 133 (1-3) : 45 - 48
  • [2] Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (K88) induce proinflammatory responses in porcine intestinal epithelial cells
    Devriendt, Bert
    Stuyven, Edith
    Verdonck, Frank
    Goddeeris, Bruno M.
    Cox, Eric
    DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 34 (11): : 1175 - 1182
  • [3] Intestinal receptors for adhesive fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) K88 in swine -: a review
    Jin, LZ
    Zhao, X
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2000, 54 (03) : 311 - 318
  • [4] Intestinal receptors for adhesive fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) K88 in swine – a review
    L. Z. Jin
    X. Zhao
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2000, 54 : 311 - 318
  • [5] PATHOGENICITY OF PORCINE ENTEROTOXIGENIC ESCHERICHIA-COLI THAT DO NOT EXPRESS K88, K99, F41, OR 987P ADHESINS
    CASEY, TA
    NAGY, B
    MOON, HW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1992, 53 (09) : 1488 - 1492
  • [6] Glycomacropeptide from camel milk inhibits the adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 to porcine cells
    Althnaibat, Rami M.
    Koch, Mandy
    Bruce, Heather L.
    Wefers, Daniel
    Gaenzle, Michael G.
    INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2022, 134
  • [7] Soybean product inhibits K88 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli binding to enterocytes
    Lin, Jun
    He, Dong
    Van Hout, Amber
    Kaushik, Radhey
    Francis, David
    Erickson, Alan
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22
  • [8] Inhibition of adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 by soya bean tempe
    Kiers, JL
    Nout, MJR
    Rombouts, FM
    Nabuurs, MJA
    van der Meulen, J
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 35 (04) : 311 - 315
  • [9] Mouse duodenum as a model of inflammation induced by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88
    Wang, Kai
    Qi, Yu
    Yi, Shushuai
    Pei, Zhihua
    Pan, Na
    Hu, Guixue
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (01) : 19 - 23
  • [10] Biorecognition of Escherichia coli K88 adhesin for glycated porcine albumin
    Sarabia-Sainz, Andre-i
    Ramos-Clamont, Gabriela
    del Carmen Candia-Plata, Ma. Maria
    Vazquez-Moreno, Luz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2009, 44 (02) : 175 - 181