Mohajerani method: Tool for determining the liquid limit of soils using fall cone test results with strong correlation with the Casagrande test

被引:7
|
作者
Hrubesova, Eva [1 ]
Lunackova, Barbara [1 ]
Mohyla, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Geotech & Underground Engn, 17 Listopadu 2172-15, Ostrava 70800, Czech Republic
关键词
Liquid limit; Plastic limit; Fall cone test; Casagrande cup; Mohajerani method; UNDRAINED SHEAR-STRENGTH; MEASURING PLASTIC LIMIT; FINE-GRAINED SOILS; PENETRATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105852
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The European Standard EN ISO 17892-12:2018 describes the means of determining the liquid limit (LL) of soils using two independent test methods: the Casagrande percussion cup and fall cone test. The first method is characterized mainly by its universality and the second by its simplicity. However, these two methods are known to provide different results. The higher the LL, the greater is the difference between the results. In 2019, Shimobe and Spagnoli established a correlation between the Casagrande and fall cone tests for soils with LL < 150%, based on an analysis of over 100 experimental datasets. However, further studies are required for soils with LL > 150%. Mohajerani method, which combines the universality of the former method and the simplicity of the latter, is applicable for such soils. The main objective of the study was to apply the Mohajerani method to determine the LLs based on fall cone test results and to compare them with those of the Casagrande test (soft base), with focus on soils with LL > 150%. The experimental results showed that for high plasticity soil (containing bentonite, etc.), the differences in the LL between the Casagrande and fall cone tests are significant (ab to relative ratio 30%), and some modification of the fall cone test evaluation is required. This study confirmed excellent agreement between the LL evaluated using the Mohajerani method (i.e., modification of the fall cone test evaluation) and that obtained from the Casagrande test, even for soils with higher LLs. Furthermore, the fall cone test results were used to determine the plastic limit (PL) for those soils with LLs within 20-50% for which the Casagrande LL and standard fall cone LL were correlated (where the latter was not modified by the Mohajerani method). Determination of the PL for these types of soils via the fall cone test results offers credible results comparable to those of the standard thread rolling test.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Discussion of "Mohajerani method: Tool for determining the liquid limit of soils using fall cone test results with strong correlation with the Casagrande test" by E. Hrubesova, B. Lunackova and M. Mohyla [Engineering Geology 278 (2020) 105852]
    O'Kelly, Brendan C.
    Vardanega, Paul J.
    Haigh, Stuart K.
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2022, 302
  • [2] Liquid limit determination of clayey material by Casagrande method, fall cone test and EBS parameter
    Quintela, A.
    Costa, C.
    Terroso, D.
    Rocha, F.
    MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 29 (B2) : B82 - B87
  • [3] Consistency measurement of cement-treated marine clay using fall cone test and Casagrande liquid limit test
    Kang, Gyeongo
    Tsuchida, Takashi
    Tang, T. X.
    Kalim, T. P.
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2017, 57 (05) : 802 - 814
  • [4] Comparison of Liquid Limit of Soils Resulted from Casagrande Test and Modificated Cone Penetrometer Methodology
    Hrubesova, Eva
    Lunackova, Barbara
    Brodzki, Ondrej
    PROCEEDING OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF CIVIL, URBAN AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 : 364 - 370
  • [5] Comparison of the Casagrande and Fall Cone Methods for Liquid Limit Determinations in Different Clay Soils
    Crevelin, Leticia Garcia
    Bicelho, Katie Vanessa
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2019, 43
  • [6] Machine learning techniques for relating liquid limit obtained by Casagrande cup and fall cone test in low-medium plasticity fine grained soils
    Diaz, E.
    Pastor, J. L.
    Rabat, A.
    Tomas, R.
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2021, 294
  • [7] Liquid limit of low- to medium-plasticity soils: comparison between Casagrande cup and cone penetrometer test
    Di Matteo, Lucio
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 71 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [8] Liquid limit of low- to medium-plasticity soils: comparison between Casagrande cup and cone penetrometer test
    Lucio Di Matteo
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2012, 71 : 79 - 85
  • [9] Revisiting the Liquid Limit Determinations Using Casagrande Percussion Cup Method vs. Fall Cone Device
    Niazi, Fawad S.
    Pinan-Llamas, Aranzazu
    Sulaman, Bilal
    GEO-CONGRESS 2022: SITE AND SOIL CHARACTERIZATION, COMPUTATIONAL GEOTECHNICS, RISK, AND LESSONS LEARNED, 2022, 333 : 152 - 161
  • [10] Influence of various factors on the difference in the liquid limit values determined by Casagrande’s and fall cone method
    Anil Kumar Mishra
    Masami Ohtsubo
    Loretta Y. Li
    Takahiro Higashi
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012, 65 : 21 - 27