Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Maize Evapotranspiration Crop Coefficients under Fully Irrigated, Limited Irrigation, and Rainfed Settings

被引:24
|
作者
Rudnick, D. R. [1 ]
Irmak, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
Alfalfa reference; Crop coefficient; Evapotranspiration; Grass reference; Growing degree days; Stress factor; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; CORN YIELD RESPONSE; PLATTE RIVER-BASIN; TRANSPIRATION; PRODUCTIVITY; CLIMATE; CANOPY; GROWTH; RATIO;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000778
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
One of the common methods for estimating actual evapotranspiration (ETa) is the two-step approach, which relates crop-specific crop coefficients (K-c) to a reference surface ET, typically alfalfa or grass (ETr and ETo, respectively). Minimal, if any, study has reported K-c values for water, nutrient, and both water and nutrient deficiencies. In this study, alfalfa (K-cr) and grass (K-co) reference maize (Zea mays L.) K-c values were developed as a function of growing degree days (GDDs) for 0, 84, 140, 196, and 252 kg ha(-1) nitrogen (N) treatments under fully irrigated (FIT), limited irrigation (75% FIT), and rainfed conditions at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln South Central Agricultural Laboratory (SCAL) near Clay Center, Nebraska, for the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons. The research also investigated a stress factor (K-stress) to assess the reduction in crop water use as compared with a nonlimiting water and N treatment (reference). In 2011, maximum Kc(r) values ranged from 0.95 to 1.27 and occurred between GDD values of 995 and 1,163 degrees C (late July to early August), which corresponded to the R1 to R3 growth stages, whereas in 2012 (much drier), maximum Kcr values ranged from 0.84 to 1.19 for 75% FIT and FIT and existed between GDD values of 1,111 and 1,267 degrees C (R2 to R4 growth stages). On average, greater Kcr values existed at higher N rates (e.g., 196 and 252 kgN ha(-1)) compared with lower N rates. Lower N treatments typically reached their maximum Kcr value earlier in the growing season and began to decrease towards harvest. Rainfed and 75% FIT experienced a greater reduction in Kstress as compared with FIT as well as lower N rate treatments as compared with higher N treatments. A water stress factor (K-w) was calculated to determine the portion of Kstress attributed with water stress alone. The monthly average values often experienced lower Kstress compared with Kw values, indicating that Kw alone was unable to account for the total reduction in Kcr from a nonlimiting water and N reference. Thus, an N stress factor (K-n) was also quantified by assuming Kstress was the product of water and N stress (e.g., K-stress K-w x K-n). The seasonal average K-n was 1.15 in 2011 and 0.64 in 2012. Values of K-n were always lower in the drier year in 2012 than in 2011, ranging from 0.45 towards the end of the season in 2012 to a maximum of 1.27 in August 2011. In general, K-n decreased as N rate decreased and K-n had a decreasing trend (e.g., greater N stress) throughout the growing season, especially in the drier year in 2012. The reduction in K-n over time was due to the temporal reduction in readily available N as well as compounding effects of reduced N on plant growth and consequently crop water uptake over the growing season. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SOIL WATER EXTRACTION PATTERNS AND CROP, IRRIGATION, AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF MAIZE UNDER FULL AND LIMITED IRRIGATION AND RAINFED SETTINGS
    Djaman, K.
    Irmak, S.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (04) : 1223 - 1238
  • [2] Actual Crop Evapotranspiration and Alfalfa- and Grass-Reference Crop Coefficients of Maize under Full and Limited Irrigation and Rainfed Conditions
    Djaman, K.
    Irmak, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (06) : 433 - 446
  • [3] Economic Return versus Crop Water Productivity of Maize for Various Nitrogen Rates under Full Irrigation, Limited Irrigation, and Rainfed Settings in South Central Nebraska
    Rudnick, Daran
    Irmak, Suat
    Ferguson, Richard
    Shaver, Tim
    Djaman, Koffi
    Slater, Glen
    Bereuter, Aaron
    Ward, Nicholas
    Francis, Dennis
    Schmer, Marty
    Wienhold, Brian
    Van Donk, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (06)
  • [4] Discussion of "Actual Crop Evapotranspiration and Alfalfa- and Grass-Reference Crop Coefficients of Maize under Full and Limited Irrigation and Rainfed Conditions" by K. Djaman and S. Irmak
    Yildirim, Gurol
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (07)
  • [5] Performance of AquaCrop model in simulating maize growth, yield, and evapotranspiration under rainfed, limited and full irrigation
    Sandhu, Rupinder
    Irmak, Suat
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 223
  • [6] Soybean crop coefficients under different seeding rates and full and limited irrigation and rainfed management
    Irmak, Suat
    Sandhu, Rupinder
    [J]. IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2024, 73 (01) : 151 - 179
  • [7] Quantification of nitrogen transformation and leaching response to agronomic management for maize crop under rainfed and irrigated condition
    Srivastava, R. K.
    Panda, R. K.
    Chakraborty, Arun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 265 (PT A)
  • [8] Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) in Trinidad
    Simon, CM
    Ekwue, EI
    Gumbs, FA
    Narayan, CV
    [J]. TROPICAL AGRICULTURE, 1998, 75 (03): : 342 - 347
  • [9] Parceling of phosphorus fertilizer in the cotton crop under irrigated and rainfed systems of cultivation
    Aquino, Leonardo A.
    Berger, Paulo G.
    Oliveira, Rubens A.
    Neves, Julio C. L.
    Lima, Tricia C.
    Batista, Carlos H.
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2011, 15 (05): : 463 - 470
  • [10] Evapotranspiration, Yield and Crop Coefficient of Irrigated Maize Under Straw Mulch
    ZHANG Xi-Ying
    [J]. Pedosphere, 2005, (05) : 34 - 42